IXUS ranks 3rd and ACWX 5th of 8 funds in the Total International Market Category.
ACWX vs IXUS
IXUS −0.25pt a year
0.32%0.07%
ACWX 1.5×the volume
2.98M2M
IXUS +0.2pt
+8.9%+9.1%
ACWX vs IXUS Performance
+48.3%+47.5%
- ACWX 0.32%
- IXUS 0.07%, better
- ACWX $17.7B
- IXUS $56.8B
- ACWX +13.6%, better
- IXUS +13.5%
- ACWX 2.59%
- IXUS 3.04%, better
- ACWX 1895
- IXUS 4596
- ACWX 2.98M sh, better
- IXUS 2M sh
- ACWX $73.27
- IXUS $92.10
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACWX | IXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55 | B55 |
| Tradability | A73 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B62 | B67Higher |
Rank among Total International Market funds
Same Category. ACWX and IXUS are both graded against the same 8 Total International Market funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACWXB
IXUSA
In short
ACWX One ticker for everything outside America: roughly 1,900 large and mid-cap stocks across developed and emerging markets, running since 2008. The convenience is real, and so is the price tag next to its cheaper index cousins.
IXUS One ticker for the stock market outside the US: developed and emerging, mega caps down to small caps, roughly 4,300 stocks, for 0.07% a year. The whole rest of the world in a single line item.
Stated mandate
ACWX The Fund seeks to track an index of large- and mid-capitalization non-U.S. equities. Its index covers developed and emerging markets excluding the United States, and the Fund uses representative sampling while generally investing at least 80% in index components or substantially identical instruments.
IXUS The Fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-capitalization non-U.S. equities. It uses an indexing approach and generally invests at least 80% of assets in the Underlying Index’s component securities or substantially identical investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACWX vs IXUS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACWX vs IXUS Cost
Overpaying ACWX vs IXUS
$5,062
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACWX 0.32%
$6,542
IXUS 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACWX | IXUS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $128 | $452 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $503 | $1,747 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $1,480 | $5,062 |
- 0.32%ACWX
- 0.07%IXUS, cheaper
- Middle half of Total International Market funds
- Median 0.23%
IXUS 3rd cheapest of 8 funds
ACWX 7th cheapest of 8 funds
ACWX vs IXUS Dividends
- ACWX 2.59%
- IXUS 3.04%, better
- ACWX $1.90
- IXUS $2.80
- ACWX $0.85
- IXUS $1.23
- ACWX Jun 15, 2026
- IXUS Jun 15, 2026
- ACWX Jun 18, 2026
- IXUS Jun 18, 2026
- ACWX Twice a year
- IXUS Twice a year
Distribution history
ACWX vs IXUS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ACWX
- IXUS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACWX 11.9%IXUS 11.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- ACWX 1.27IXUS 1.28, better
- Worst fall
- ACWX −29.1%, betterIXUS −29.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ACWX 0.84IXUS 0.92
ACWX and IXUS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.28%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




