ACYQ vs BRKC: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF

BRKCBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.26pt a year

ACYQ0.75%BRKC1.01%

Avg volume · 30D

ACYQ 19.1×the volume

ACYQ98KBRKC5.13K

ACYQ vs BRKC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ+4.1%BRKC

Expense ratio: ACYQ 0.75%, better; BRKC 1.01%
Fund size: ACYQ $102M; BRKC $8M
1Y total return: ACYQ No data; BRKC +8.8%
Yield (12M): ACYQ No data; BRKC 19.75%
Holdings: ACYQ 7; BRKC 9
Avg volume (30D): ACYQ 98K sh, better; BRKC 5.13K sh
NAV per share: ACYQ $20.20; BRKC $40.88
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of Oct 28, 2026

Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, BRKC, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	ACYQ	BRKC
Cost30% weight	A99Higher	B59
Mission25% weight	Not scored	A86
Risk15% weight	A96Higher	A84
Tradability15% weight	B55	B58Higher
Holdings10% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Durability5% weight	B66Higher	B58

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. ACYQ and BRKC are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds

See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and BRKC 5th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
Rank 4AAAPYKurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETFScore 79
Rank 5BBRKCYieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETFScore 70
Rank 6BSNOYYieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETFScore 67

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

BRKCBYieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

BRKC YieldMax points its option-income machinery at the ultimate buy-and-hold name. BRKC sells upside on Berkshire Hathaway to generate current income, and it never actually owns the shares.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

BRKC BRKC seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share-price returns of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.B), with potential gains limited by its options strategy.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

BRKC Expense ratio of 1.01%, a shade under the median for single-stock option-income ETFs, in a corner of the market where 1%-plus is the entry fee.
Grades out in the top slice of its single-stock option-income peer group, helped by a calmer measured risk profile than most funds built this way.
Mechanics stated up front: a synthetic covered call spread on BRK.B seeking current income plus indirect exposure to the stock's price moves, with gains limited by the options.

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

BRKC You hold an options package, not Berkshire stock. The call spread caps how much of a big BRK.B run-up reaches you.
The fund discloses that distributions can include return of capital, meaning part of a payout may be your own capital coming back, which lowers net asset value.
Launched in 2025 and still small and thinly traded, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads and a short history to judge the strategy on.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full BRKC profile⁠

ACYQ vs BRKC Holdings

As of Oct 28, 2026

How ACYQ and BRKC differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ACYQ and 0.0% of BRKC.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for ACYQ and BRKC.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for ACYQ.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

ACYQ100.0%
BRKC100.6%

Securities held

ACYQ6
BRKC8

Asset class

ACYQ: Multi-Asset
BRKC: Alternatives

Holdings

Only in ACYQ6
In both0
Only in BRKC8

Only in ACYQ

6 securities, 98.4% of ACYQ by weight

U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 11/27/202633.26%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 12/31/202632.26%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/202631.90%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/28/20270.64%
ACYQ Autocall Derivative JPMorgan0.18%
ACYQ Autocall Derivative BNP0.13%

Only in BRKC

8 securities, 94.4% of BRKC by weight

United States Treasury Bill 02/18/202724.78%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/202722.99%
United States Treasury Bill 07/08/202719.77%
United States Treasury Bill 12/10/202611.78%
2BRKB Us 11/20/26 C490.01 Flx10.64%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20314.30%
Brkb Us 11/06/26 C5600.07%
Brkb Us 11/06/26 C5550.03%

Weight gaps

ACYQ and BRKC share no securities.

All 3 ACYQ holdings⁠All BRKC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs BRKC Cost

Overpaying BRKC vs ACYQ

$4,368

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

ACYQ 0.75%
$14,482
BRKC 1.01%
$18,850

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

ACYQ 0.75%
BRKC 1.01%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	ACYQ	BRKC	Overpaying
10	$1,336	$1,780	$444
20	$5,078	$6,686	$1,608
30	$14,482	$18,850	$4,368

Expense ratio

0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
1.01%BRKC

ACYQ0.75%BRKC1.01%

0.51%1.91%

Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

BRKC 25th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs BRKC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): ACYQ No data; BRKC 19.75%
Payout (12M): ACYQ No data; BRKC $8.07
Last payment: ACYQ $0.39; BRKC $0.17
Ex-dividend: ACYQ Oct 1, 2026; BRKC Oct 29, 2026
Paid on: ACYQ Oct 2, 2026; BRKC Oct 30, 2026
Frequency: ACYQ Monthly; BRKC Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠

BRKCWeekly · 44 paymentsAll BRKC payments⁠

ACYQ vs BRKC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: ACYQ No dataBRKC 11.5%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: ACYQ No dataBRKC 0.09since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: ACYQ No dataBRKC −7.6%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: ACYQ 1.82BRKC −0.03; Market = 1

ACYQ and BRKC in the news

All news⁠

New ETFs
First Trust's new ETF buffers the contracts, not the shares
Oct 8, 2026ACYQ
ETF Filings
First Trust proposes an autocallable ETF that rolls into the most volatile sector
Sep 22, 2026ACYQ

Popular comparisons

ACYQAvsKWINA
FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.51%
Category
BRKCBvsKWINA
YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF
Expense ratio
1.01% · 0.51%
Category
ACYQAvsXXVA
FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.78%
Category
BRKCBvsXXVA
YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF
Expense ratio
1.01% · 0.78%
Category
ACYQAvsAAPYA
FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
Expense ratio
0.75% · 0.99%
Category
BRKCBvsAAPYA
YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF
Expense ratio
1.01% · 0.99%
Category

ACYQ vs BRKC

In short

Stated mandate

Why people hold it

Worth knowing

How ACYQ and BRKC differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in ACYQ

Only in BRKC

Weight gaps

Cost over time

Year by year

Distribution history

Fall from peak · 5 years

Risk facts

First Trust's new ETF buffers the contracts, not the shares

First Trust proposes an autocallable ETF that rolls into the most volatile sector

How ACYQ and BRKC differ

Level by level

Sector

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Concentration

Asset class

Holdings

Only in ACYQ

Only in BRKC

Weight gaps