KWIN ranks 1st and BRKC 5th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
BRKC vs KWIN
KWIN −0.50pt a year
1.01%0.51%
KWIN 2.7×the volume
5.13K14K
BRKC vs KWIN Performance
+5.6%+2.9%
- BRKC 1.01%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- BRKC $8M
- KWIN $63M
- BRKC +8.8%
- KWIN
- BRKC 19.75%
- KWIN
- BRKC 9
- KWIN 55
- BRKC 5.13K sh
- KWIN 14K sh, better
- BRKC $40.88
- KWIN $25.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BRKC | KWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B59 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A86 | |
| Risk | A84 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | B58 | B68Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. BRKC and KWIN are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BRKCB
KWINA
In short
BRKC YieldMax points its option-income machinery at the ultimate buy-and-hold name. BRKC sells upside on Berkshire Hathaway to generate current income, and it never actually owns the shares.
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
Stated mandate
BRKC BRKC seeks current income while providing indirect exposure to the share-price returns of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.B), with potential gains limited by its options strategy.
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BRKC vs KWIN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BRKC vs KWIN Cost
Overpaying BRKC vs KWIN
$8,685
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BRKC 1.01%
$18,850
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BRKC | KWIN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,780 | $918 | $862 |
| 20 | $6,686 | $3,527 | $3,159 |
| 30 | $18,850 | $10,165 | $8,685 |
- 1.01%BRKC
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
BRKC 25th cheapest of 71 funds
BRKC vs KWIN Dividends
- BRKC 19.75%
- KWIN
- BRKC $8.07
- KWIN None
- BRKC $0.17
- KWIN
- BRKC Oct 29, 2026
- KWIN
- BRKC Oct 30, 2026
- KWIN
- BRKC Weekly
- KWIN
Distribution history
BRKC vs KWIN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BRKC 11.5%KWIN
- Return per unit of risk
- BRKC 0.09KWIN
- Worst fall
- BRKC −7.6%KWIN
- Market sensitivity
- BRKC −0.03KWIN 0.001
Popular comparisons
- 1.01% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.