Skip to content

ACYQ vs MRNY

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF

MRNYBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.25pt a year

ACYQ0.75%MRNY1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

MRNY 3.3×the volume

ACYQ98KMRNY324K

ACYQ vs MRNY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ+249.7%MRNY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +6.6%. MRNY +249.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.50%100%150%200%300%Jul 31Sep 14Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
MRNY 1.00%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
MRNY $238M
1Y total return
ACYQ No data
MRNY +474.5%
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
MRNY 46.22%
Holdings
ACYQ 7
MRNY 11
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh
MRNY 324K sh, better
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
MRNY $40.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. MRNY: Cost 77, Risk 46, Mission 50, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, MRNY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQMRNY
Cost30% weightA99HigherA77
Mission25% weightNot scoredC50
Risk15% weightA96HigherC46
Tradability15% weightB55B62Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66A81Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and MRNY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and MRNY 13th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 13BGOOPKurv Yield Premium Strategy Google (GOOGL) ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 13BMRNYYieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 13BTSMYYieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

MRNYBYieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

MRNY Moderna, but with a job. MRNY sells weekly call spreads on MRNA and routes the premium out as a monthly distribution, keeping room for some upside through the spread's long leg. You still carry the stock's downside, without owning the shares.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

MRNY MRNY is actively managed to generate weekly income by selling call spreads on Moderna Inc., while seeking participation in appreciation of the underlying share price.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • MRNY Charges 1.00% a year, below the typical fee in its single-stock option-income peer group.
  • Sells call spreads rather than plain calls, so the long leg leaves room to participate in part of a Moderna rally instead of surrendering all of it.yieldmaxetfs.com
  • Options are written weekly and cash goes out monthly, an actively managed rhythm built around one stock's premium.
  • Live since 2023, one of the earlier single-stock income funds in a category that has since crowded to dozens of tickers.

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • MRNY Synthetic exposure: you take Moderna's declines without holding the shares, and the short call caps how much of an advance the fund keeps.
  • Payouts come from option premiums, which rise and fall with Moderna's option pricing. Monthly amounts vary rather than run at a set rate.
  • The 1.00% fee buys the overlay and the active management, not a plain stake in the underlying stock.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full MRNY profile⁠

ACYQ vs MRNY Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs MRNY Cost

Overpaying MRNY vs ACYQ

$4,206

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • MRNY 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • MRNY 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530MRNY $18,688ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQMRNYOverpaying
10$1,336$1,763$427
20$5,078$6,625$1,547
30$14,482$18,688$4,206

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.00%MRNY
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

MRNY 20th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs MRNY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
MRNY 46.22%
Payout (12M)
ACYQ No data
MRNY $18.83
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
MRNY $0.54
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
MRNY Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
MRNY Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
MRNY Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD
MRNYWeekly · 44 paymentsAll MRNY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 2, 2026 $0.16; Jan 8, 2026 $0.18; Jan 15, 2026 $0.25; Jan 22, 2026 $0.37; Jan 29, 2026 $0.48; Feb 5, 2026 $0.27; Feb 12, 2026 $0.35; Feb 19, 2026 $0.32; Feb 26, 2026 $0.38; Mar 5, 2026 $0.38; Mar 12, 2026 $0.39; Mar 19, 2026 $0.38; Mar 26, 2026 $0.27; Apr 2, 2026 $0.28; Apr 9, 2026 $0.26; Apr 16, 2026 $0.26; Apr 23, 2026 $0.26; Apr 30, 2026 $0.22; May 7, 2026 $0.16; May 14, 2026 $0.24; May 21, 2026 $0.18; May 28, 2026 $0.24; Jun 4, 2026 $0.21; Jun 11, 2026 $0.21; Jun 18, 2026 $0.22; Jun 25, 2026 $0.36; Jul 2, 2026 $0.39; Jul 9, 2026 $0.43; Jul 16, 2026 $0.36; Jul 23, 2026 $0.25; Jul 30, 2026 $0.24; Aug 6, 2026 $0.20; Aug 13, 2026 $0.22; Aug 20, 2026 $0.23; Aug 27, 2026 $0.89; Sep 3, 2026 $0.64; Sep 10, 2026 $0.64; Sep 17, 2026 $0.57; Sep 24, 2026 $0.64; Oct 1, 2026 $0.81; Oct 8, 2026 $0.75; Oct 15, 2026 $0.81; Oct 22, 2026 $0.89; Oct 29, 2026 $0.54. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

ACYQ vs MRNY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACYQ No dataMRNY 98.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACYQ No dataMRNY 0.48
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACYQ No dataMRNY −82.2%since Oct 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82MRNY −0.09

ACYQ and MRNY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MRNYBvsKWINA

    YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MRNYBvsXXVA

    YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MRNYBvsAAPYA

    YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.