ACYQ ranks 2nd and MST 69th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
ACYQ vs MST
0.0%by weight
ACYQ −1.16pt a year
0.75%1.91%
MST 1.2×the volume
98K119K
ACYQ vs MST Performance
+6.6%+73.1%
- ACYQ 0.75%, better
- MST 1.91%
- ACYQ $102M
- MST $21M
- ACYQ
- MST −87.5%
- ACYQ
- MST 256.92%
- ACYQ 7
- MST 9
- ACYQ 98K sh
- MST 119K sh, better
- ACYQ $20.20
- MST $10.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ACYQ | MST |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F0 |
| Mission | F0 | |
| Risk | A96Higher | F13 |
| Tradability | B55 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B66Higher | B55 |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. ACYQ and MST are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ACYQA
MSTF
In short
MST Most single-stock income ETFs sell away upside to fund the payout. MST runs both plays at once: derivatives targeting 150% to 200% of MSTR's daily move, with sold call spreads layered on top for premium income.
Stated mandate
MST The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and, secondarily, current income. It uses derivatives for approximately 150%–200% daily exposure to MSTR and sells credit call spreads to generate premium income and manage leveraged-exposure risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ACYQ vs MST Holdings
How ACYQ and MST differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ACYQ and 0.0% of MST.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for ACYQ and MST.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ACYQ.
Concentration
- ACYQ100.0%
- MST229.9%
- ACYQ6
- MST5
Asset class
- ACYQ
- Multi-Asset
- MST
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in ACYQ6
- In both0
- Only in MST5
Only in ACYQ
6 securities, 98.4% of ACYQ by weight
- U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 11/27/202633.26%
- U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 12/31/202632.26%
- U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/202631.90%
- U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/28/20270.64%
- ACYQ Autocall Derivative JPMorgan0.18%
- ACYQ Autocall Derivative BNP0.13%
Only in MST
5 securities, 70.6% of MST by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202636.45%
- Strategy Cll Opt 11/26 7519.13%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20319.94%
- Strategy Cll Opt 11/26 1372.72%
- United States Treasury Bill 02/18/20272.40%
Weight gaps
ACYQ and MST share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ACYQ vs MST Cost
Overpaying MST vs ACYQ
$17,296
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ACYQ 0.75%
$14,482
MST 1.91%
$31,778
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ACYQ | MST | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $3,242 | $1,906 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $11,705 | $6,627 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $31,778 | $17,296 |
- 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
- 1.91%MST
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds
MST 71st cheapest of 71 funds
ACYQ vs MST Dividends
- ACYQ
- MST 256.92%
- ACYQ
- MST $25.71
- ACYQ $0.39
- MST $0.07
- ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
- MST Oct 28, 2026
- ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
- MST Oct 29, 2026
- ACYQ Monthly
- MST Weekly
Distribution history
ACYQ vs MST Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ACYQ MST 122.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ACYQ MST −0.88
- Worst fall
- ACYQ MST −97.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ACYQ 1.82MST 4.97
ACYQ and MST in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.91% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.91% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.91% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

