Skip to content
etf.net

ACYQ vs NFLY

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF

NFLYBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.26pt a year

ACYQ0.75%NFLY1.01%

Avg volume · 30D

ACYQ 1.5×the volume

ACYQ98KNFLY65.8K

ACYQ vs NFLY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ−13.8%NFLY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +6.6%. NFLY −13.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%10%Jul 31Sep 14Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
NFLY 1.01%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
NFLY $28M
1Y total return
ACYQ No data
NFLY −40.8%
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
NFLY 65.35%
Holdings
ACYQ 7
NFLY 7
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh, better
NFLY 65.8K sh
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
NFLY $5.97
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. NFLY: Cost 59, Risk 38, Mission 70, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 77.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, NFLY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQNFLY
Cost30% weightA99HigherB59
Mission25% weightNot scoredA70
Risk15% weightA96HigherD38
Tradability15% weightB55HigherC48
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66A77Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and NFLY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and NFLY 21st of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 21BMAROYieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETFScore 57
  5. Rank 21BNFLYYieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETFScore 57
  6. Rank 21BPLTYYieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

NFLYBYieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

NFLY NFLY never buys a share of Netflix. It builds the position synthetically with options, then sells calls against it, turning one of the market's twitchiest large caps into option premium. Pops get capped. Drops don't.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

NFLY The Fund seeks current income and exposure to Netflix, Inc.’s share-price returns, subject to limited participation in potential gains. It uses synthetic covered-call or covered-call-spread strategies to generate option premiums.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • NFLY At 1.01%, it is the cheaper of the two Netflix option-income ETFs (NFLP charges 1.15%) and sits under the median fee for single-stock option-income funds.
  • Launched in 2023, an early entrant in single-name option income, with a multi-year record of running the strategy through Netflix earnings nights.
  • In a crowded field of single-stock overlay funds, this one lands in the upper tier of its peer group on our review.

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • NFLY Selling calls caps how much of a Netflix rally you keep, while a slide in the stock flows through nearly in full.yieldmaxetfs.com
  • Distributions can include return of capital, meaning part of a payout is your own money coming back and it trims your cost basis.yieldmaxetfs.com
  • The 1.01% fee pays for the options machinery, several times what a plain equity index fund charges, and it applies whether premiums are fat or thin.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full NFLY profile⁠

ACYQ vs NFLY Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs NFLY Cost

Overpaying NFLY vs ACYQ

$4,368

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • NFLY 1.01%

    $18,850

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • NFLY 1.01%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NFLY $18,850ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQNFLYOverpaying
10$1,336$1,780$444
20$5,078$6,686$1,608
30$14,482$18,850$4,368

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.01%NFLY
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

NFLY 25th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs NFLY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
NFLY 65.35%
Payout (12M)
ACYQ No data
NFLY $3.89
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
NFLY $0.05
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
NFLY Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
NFLY Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
NFLY Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
NFLYWeekly · 44 paymentsAll NFLY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 2, 2026 $0.07; Jan 8, 2026 $0.07; Jan 15, 2026 $0.06; Jan 22, 2026 $0.06; Jan 29, 2026 $0.08; Feb 5, 2026 $0.06; Feb 12, 2026 $0.06; Feb 19, 2026 $0.06; Feb 26, 2026 $0.07; Mar 5, 2026 $0.17; Mar 12, 2026 $0.18; Mar 19, 2026 $0.25; Mar 26, 2026 $0.14; Apr 2, 2026 $0.09; Apr 9, 2026 $0.08; Apr 16, 2026 $0.10; Apr 23, 2026 $0.08; Apr 30, 2026 $0.07; May 7, 2026 $0.07; May 14, 2026 $0.07; May 21, 2026 $0.06; May 28, 2026 $0.06; Jun 4, 2026 $0.06; Jun 11, 2026 $0.05; Jun 18, 2026 $0.05; Jun 25, 2026 $0.05; Jul 2, 2026 $0.05; Jul 9, 2026 $0.05; Jul 16, 2026 $0.04; Jul 23, 2026 $0.05; Jul 30, 2026 $0.04; Aug 6, 2026 $0.07; Aug 13, 2026 $0.05; Aug 20, 2026 $0.06; Aug 27, 2026 $0.06; Sep 3, 2026 $0.07; Sep 10, 2026 $0.05; Sep 17, 2026 $0.04; Sep 24, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 8, 2026 $0.03; Oct 15, 2026 $0.03; Oct 22, 2026 $0.04; Oct 29, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ACYQ vs NFLY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACYQ No dataNFLY 26.8%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACYQ No dataNFLY 0.28
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACYQ No dataNFLY −48.8%since Aug 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82NFLY 0.58

ACYQ and NFLY in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NFLYBvsKWINA

    YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NFLYBvsXXVA

    YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NFLYBvsAAPYA

    YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.01% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.