KWIN ranks 1st and NFLY 21st of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
KWIN vs NFLY
KWIN −0.50pt a year
0.51%1.01%
NFLY 4.7×the volume
14K65.8K
KWIN vs NFLY Performance
+2.9%−31.1%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- NFLY 1.01%
- KWIN $63M
- NFLY $28M
- KWIN
- NFLY −40.8%
- KWIN
- NFLY 65.35%
- KWIN 55
- NFLY 7
- KWIN 14K sh
- NFLY 65.8K sh, better
- KWIN $25.90
- NFLY $5.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KWIN | NFLY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B59 |
| Mission | A70 | |
| Risk | A86Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | B68 | A77Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. KWIN and NFLY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KWINA
NFLYB
In short
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
NFLY NFLY never buys a share of Netflix. It builds the position synthetically with options, then sells calls against it, turning one of the market's twitchiest large caps into option premium. Pops get capped. Drops don't.
Stated mandate
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
NFLY The Fund seeks current income and exposure to Netflix, Inc.’s share-price returns, subject to limited participation in potential gains. It uses synthetic covered-call or covered-call-spread strategies to generate option premiums.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KWIN vs NFLY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KWIN vs NFLY Cost
Overpaying NFLY vs KWIN
$8,685
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
NFLY 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KWIN | NFLY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $918 | $1,780 | $862 |
| 20 | $3,527 | $6,686 | $3,159 |
| 30 | $10,165 | $18,850 | $8,685 |
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- 1.01%NFLY
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
NFLY 25th cheapest of 71 funds
KWIN vs NFLY Dividends
- KWIN
- NFLY 65.35%
- KWIN None
- NFLY $3.89
- KWIN
- NFLY $0.05
- KWIN
- NFLY Oct 29, 2026
- KWIN
- NFLY Oct 30, 2026
- KWIN
- NFLY Weekly
Distribution history
KWIN vs NFLY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KWIN NFLY 26.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- KWIN NFLY 0.28
- Worst fall
- KWIN NFLY −48.8%
- Market sensitivity
- KWIN 0.001NFLY 0.58
Popular comparisons
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.