Skip to content

ACYQ vs SNOY

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

ACYQANYSE Arca

YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF

SNOYBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ACYQ −0.25pt a year

ACYQ0.75%SNOY1.00%

Avg volume · 30D

SNOY 1.5×the volume

ACYQ98KSNOY145K

ACYQ vs SNOY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026

+6.6%ACYQ+14.1%SNOY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 28, 2026. ACYQ +6.6%. SNOY +14.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Jul 31Sep 14Oct 28
Expense ratio
ACYQ 0.75%, better
SNOY 1.00%
Fund size
ACYQ $102M
SNOY $61M
1Y total return
ACYQ No data
SNOY +10.1%
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
SNOY 72.80%
Holdings
ACYQ 7
SNOY 10
Avg volume (30D)
ACYQ 98K sh
SNOY 145K sh, better
NAV per share
ACYQ $20.20
SNOY $9.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ACYQ as of

ACYQ: Cost 99, Risk 96, Mission not scored, Tradability 55, Holdings not scored, Durability 66. SNOY: Cost 77, Risk 46, Mission 70, Tradability 63, Holdings not scored, Durability 77.
Pillar letters and Scores for ACYQ, SNOY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarACYQSNOY
Cost30% weightA99HigherA77
Mission25% weightNot scoredA70
Risk15% weightA96HigherC46
Tradability15% weightB55B63Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB66A77Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ACYQ and SNOY are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Option Income⁠

Category · 71 funds
See all 71 ›

ACYQ ranks 2nd and SNOY 6th of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AKWINKraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AACYQFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 3AXXVSimplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETFScore 84
  4. Rank 5ABRKCYieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETFScore 70
  5. Rank 6BSNOYYieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETFScore 67
  6. Rank 7BAMZPKurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon (AMZN) ETFScore 66

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ACYQAFT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF

SNOYBYieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF

In short

ACYQ No data

SNOY Snowflake with a paycheck stapled on. SNOY sells call spreads on SNOW to harvest option premium, keeping a slice of the upside instead of capping it flat, and pays out monthly.

Stated mandate

ACYQ No data

SNOY The fund seeks weekly income by actively selling call spreads on Snowflake Inc. The strategy harvests option premiums while retaining some participation in Snowflake's share-price appreciation.

Why people hold it

ACYQ No data

  • SNOY Sells call spreads rather than plain calls, so some participation in Snowflake's share-price appreciation is retained alongside the premium harvest.
  • 1.00% expense ratio runs a touch leaner than the typical single-stock option income fund, including YieldMax siblings TSMY and BRKC.
  • Distributions land monthly, funded by an options program the manager works on a weekly cadence.
  • Rates among the stronger builds in a crowded single-stock income cohort, helped by cost and staying power.

Worth knowing

ACYQ No data

  • SNOY Exposure is synthetic. The fund uses options on Snowflake rather than owning the shares, so you carry SNOW's downside without shareholder rights.
  • Income is a byproduct of option premiums, which rise and fall with Snowflake's volatility. Payout size varies month to month.
  • Launched in 2024, so the risk picture rests on a short history, and one company's news cycle drives the whole fund.

Full ACYQ profile⁠

Full SNOY profile⁠

ACYQ vs SNOY Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ACYQ vs SNOY Cost

Overpaying SNOY vs ACYQ

$4,206

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ACYQ 0.75%

    $14,482

  • SNOY 1.00%

    $18,688

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ACYQ 0.75%
  • SNOY 1.00%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530SNOY $18,688ACYQ $14,482

Year by year

YearACYQSNOYOverpaying
10$1,336$1,763$427
20$5,078$6,625$1,547
30$14,482$18,688$4,206

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%ACYQ, cheaper
  • 1.00%SNOY
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
  • Median 1.04%

ACYQ 2nd cheapest of 71 funds

SNOY 20th cheapest of 71 funds

ACYQ vs SNOY Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
ACYQ No data
SNOY 72.80%
Payout (12M)
ACYQ No data
SNOY $6.73
Last payment
ACYQ $0.39
SNOY $0.09
Ex-dividend
ACYQ Oct 1, 2026
SNOY Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
ACYQ Oct 2, 2026
SNOY Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
ACYQ Monthly
SNOY Weekly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ACYQMonthly · 2 paymentsAll ACYQ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments in 2026 YTD. Sep 1, 2026 $0.37; Oct 1, 2026 $0.39. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
SNOYWeekly · 44 paymentsAll SNOY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 44 payments in 2026 YTD. Jan 2, 2026 $0.11; Jan 8, 2026 $0.09; Jan 15, 2026 $0.07; Jan 22, 2026 $0.07; Jan 29, 2026 $0.08; Feb 5, 2026 $0.07; Feb 12, 2026 $0.08; Feb 19, 2026 $0.09; Feb 26, 2026 $0.08; Mar 5, 2026 $0.07; Mar 12, 2026 $0.13; Mar 19, 2026 $0.07; Mar 26, 2026 $0.12; Apr 2, 2026 $0.08; Apr 9, 2026 $0.10; Apr 16, 2026 $0.07; Apr 23, 2026 $0.09; Apr 30, 2026 $0.07; May 7, 2026 $0.08; May 14, 2026 $0.15; May 21, 2026 $0.10; May 28, 2026 $0.16; Jun 4, 2026 $0.23; Jun 11, 2026 $0.20; Jun 18, 2026 $0.20; Jun 25, 2026 $0.20; Jul 2, 2026 $0.14; Jul 9, 2026 $0.15; Jul 16, 2026 $0.17; Jul 23, 2026 $0.17; Jul 30, 2026 $0.14; Aug 6, 2026 $0.18; Aug 13, 2026 $0.21; Aug 20, 2026 $0.19; Aug 27, 2026 $0.18; Sep 3, 2026 $0.14; Sep 10, 2026 $0.13; Sep 17, 2026 $0.13; Sep 24, 2026 $0.13; Oct 1, 2026 $0.11; Oct 8, 2026 $0.10; Oct 15, 2026 $0.14; Oct 22, 2026 $0.08; Oct 29, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ACYQ vs SNOY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ACYQ No dataSNOY 61.6%since Jul 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ACYQ No dataSNOY 0.69since Jul 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ACYQ No dataSNOY −50.7%since Jun 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ACYQ 1.82SNOY 2.13

ACYQ and SNOY in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ACYQAvsKWINA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNOYBvsKWINA

    YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF · KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsXXVA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNOYBvsXXVA

    YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF · Simplify Ancorato Target 25 Distribution ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.78%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ACYQAvsAAPYA

    FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SNOYBvsAAPYA

    YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF · Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Apple (AAPL) ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.99%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.