AGG ranks 1st and SCHZ 2nd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
AGG vs SCHZ
0.7%by weight
=
AGG 0.03%SCHZ 0.03%
AGG 4.2×the volume
AGG 9.39MSCHZ 2.22M
AGG +0.2pt
AGG +1.2%SCHZ +1.0%
AGG vs SCHZ Performance
−2.0%−1.9%
- AGG 0.03%
- SCHZ 0.03%
- AGG $137B
- SCHZ $10.6B
- AGG −2.0%
- SCHZ −1.9%, better
- AGG 4.19%
- SCHZ 4.34%, better
- AGG 13413
- SCHZ 12611
- AGG 9.39M sh, better
- SCHZ 2.22M sh
- AGG $94.58
- SCHZ $22.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGG | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95 | A95 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C49 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | A85 |
| Holdings | A75 | A79Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | A89 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. AGG and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGGA
SCHZA
In short
AGG Launched in 2003, one of the first funds to pack the entire U.S. investment-grade bond market into a single ticker: Treasuries, corporates and mortgage bonds, three basis points a year, cash paid monthly.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
AGG The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, providing broad exposure to the total U.S. investment-grade bond market.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGG vs SCHZ Holdings
Overlap
0.7%
- 12,538
- 6
- 12,605
Holdings side by side
| Holding | AGG | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cash | 3.05% | Not held |
| GVMXX | Not held | 1.10% |
| Umbs 30YR Tba(Reg A) 5.00% 11/12/2026 | 0.16% | 0.26% |
| Umbs 30YR Tba(Reg A) 5.50% 11/12/2026 | 0.20% | 0.21% |
| Treasury Note 4.00% 02/28/2030 | 0.40% | Not held |
| Treasury Note 4.63% 02/15/2035 | 0.40% | Not held |
| Treasury Note (Old) 4.38% 05/15/2036 | 0.40% | Not held |
| Treasury Note 4.25% 11/15/2034 | 0.40% | Not held |
| Treasury Note 4.38% 05/15/2036 (BBG0221YLR31) | Not held | 0.40% |
| Treasury Note 4.38% 05/15/2034 | 0.39% | Not held |
Sectors
AGGSCHZ
- TreasuryAGG 47.2%SCHZ —
- MBS Pass-ThroughAGG 22.9%SCHZ —
- IndustrialAGG 14.3%SCHZ —
- Financial InstitutionsAGG 8.1%SCHZ —
- UtilityAGG 2.5%SCHZ —
- CMBSAGG 1.4%SCHZ —
- SovereignAGG 1.1%SCHZ —
- SupranationalAGG 0.9%SCHZ —
- Local AuthorityAGG 0.6%SCHZ —
- AgencyAGG 0.5%SCHZ —
- ABSAGG 0.4%SCHZ —
- FinancialsAGG —SCHZ 100.0%
AGG vs SCHZ Cost
- 0.03%AGG
- 0.03%SCHZ
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
0 of 113 US Aggregate Bond funds charge less than AGG
0 of 113 charge less than SCHZ
AGG vs SCHZ Dividends
- AGG: 4.19%
- SCHZ: 4.34%, better
- AGG: $3.97
- SCHZ: $0.96
- AGG: $0.33
- SCHZ: $0.08
- AGG: Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ: Oct 1, 2026
- AGG: Oct 6, 2026
- SCHZ: Oct 7, 2026
- AGG: Monthly
- SCHZ: Monthly
Distribution history
AGG vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AGG
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGG 5.6%SCHZ 5.6%=
- Return per unit of risk
- AGG −0.06, betterSCHZ −0.07
- Worst fall
- AGG −17.3%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AGG 0.99SCHZ 0.99=
AGG and SCHZ in the news

Head-to-Head
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF AGG and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF BND barely differ

Category Review
Municipal bond funds are down for the year after a third-quarter selloff erased the first-half gain

Head-to-Head
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF have returned almost the same



