IUSB ranks 2nd and AGGM 33rd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
AGGM vs IUSB
IUSB −0.14pt a year
0.20%0.06%
IUSB 345.1×the volume
17.8K6.13M
IUSB +0.4pt
+1.3%+1.7%
AGGM vs IUSB Performance
−2.7%+0.9%
- AGGM 0.20%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- AGGM $132M
- IUSB $50.2B
- AGGM −0.6%
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- AGGM 3.89%
- IUSB 4.32%, better
- AGGM 2201
- IUSB 18280
- AGGM 17.8K sh
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- AGGM $101.18
- IUSB $44.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGGM | IUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | C51 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B61 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. AGGM and IUSB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGGMA
IUSBA
In short
AGGM Government and credit, nothing else: GBF holds Treasuries and investment-grade corporate bonds across the maturity spectrum, tracking a Bloomberg index since 2007 for 0.20% a year.
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
Stated mandate
AGGM The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated government and investment-grade corporate bonds, providing diversified fixed-income exposure across sectors and maturities.
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGGM vs IUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGGM vs IUSB Cost
Overpaying AGGM vs IUSB
$2,885
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGGM 0.20%
$4,155
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGGM | IUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $110 | $255 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $432 | $989 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $1,270 | $2,885 |
- 0.20%AGGM
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
AGGM 31st cheapest of 114 funds
AGGM vs IUSB Dividends
- AGGM 3.89%
- IUSB 4.32%, better
- AGGM $3.94
- IUSB $1.94
- AGGM $0.29
- IUSB $0.15
- AGGM Oct 1, 2026
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- AGGM Oct 6, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- AGGM Monthly
- IUSB Monthly
Distribution history
AGGM vs IUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AGGM
- IUSB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGGM 5.3%, betterIUSB 5.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AGGM 0.09IUSB 0.25, better
- Worst fall
- AGGM −17.9%IUSB −17.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AGGM 0.25IUSB 0.96
AGGM and IUSB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
