DFAC ranks 3rd and AIEQ 73rd of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
AIEQ vs DFAC
DFAC −0.58pt a year
0.75%0.17%
DFAC 443.9×the volume
4.52K2M
DFAC +8.0pt
+3.1%+11.1%
AIEQ vs DFAC Performance
+16.5%+69.4%
- AIEQ 0.75%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- AIEQ $111M
- DFAC $87.7B
- AIEQ +6.3%
- DFAC +16.1%, better
- AIEQ 0.40%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- AIEQ 161
- DFAC 2553
- AIEQ 4.52K sh
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- AIEQ $48.45
- DFAC $44.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AIEQ | DFAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D36 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D37 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C52 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A87Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A97Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. AIEQ and DFAC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AIEQC
DFACA
In short
AIEQ Most AI funds buy AI companies. AIEQ flips it: a machine-learning model running on the IBM Watson platform reads news, filings and market data to pick US stocks. Live since 2017, it is one of the original AI-run ETFs.
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
Stated mandate
AIEQ The fund seeks to track the total-return performance of the AI Powered Equity Index before fees and expenses. Its AI-driven process uses historical, economic, and news information to select securities.
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AIEQ vs DFAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AIEQ vs DFAC Cost
Overpaying AIEQ vs DFAC
$10,936
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AIEQ 0.75%
$14,482
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AIEQ | DFAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $310 | $1,026 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,211 | $3,867 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $3,546 | $10,936 |
- 0.75%AIEQ
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
AIEQ 72nd cheapest of 121 funds
AIEQ vs DFAC Dividends
- AIEQ 0.40%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- AIEQ $0.19
- DFAC $0.39
- AIEQ $0.19
- DFAC $0.10
- AIEQ Dec 30, 2025
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- AIEQ Dec 31, 2025
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- AIEQ Annual
- DFAC Quarterly
Distribution history
AIEQ vs DFAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AIEQ
- DFAC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AIEQ 16.4%DFAC 12.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AIEQ 0.91DFAC 1.32, better
- Worst fall
- AIEQ −39.0%DFAC −23.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AIEQ 1.16DFAC 0.99
AIEQ and DFAC in the news
Head-to-Head
ITOT is the better U.S. stock fund than DFAC


Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.