COTG ranks 3rd and ALA 124th of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ALA vs COTG
0.0%by weight
ALA −0.32pt a year
0.45%0.77%
COTG 10.8×the volume
8.98K97.2K
ALA vs COTG Performance
−67.6%+22.2%
- ALA 0.45%, better
- COTG 0.77%
- ALA $1M
- COTG $9M
- ALA
- COTG +16.3%
- ALA 1
- COTG 4
- ALA 8.98K sh
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- ALA $3.53
- COTG $15.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ALA | COTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | B61 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | F22 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F15 | B56Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ALA and COTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ALAC
COTGA
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ALA vs COTG Holdings
How ALA and COTG differ
0.0%
About this figure: ALA gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
COTG gets much of its exposure from swaps and futures, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for ALA and COTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for ALA.
Concentration
- ALA198.4%
- COTG212.3%
- ALA0
- COTG1
Asset class
- ALA
- Stocks
- COTG
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in ALA0
- In both0
- Only in COTG1
Only in ALA
0 securities, 0.0% of ALA by weight
Only in COTG
1 security, 12.4% of COTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.36%
Weight gaps
ALA and COTG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ALA vs COTG Cost
Overpaying COTG vs ALA
$5,788
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ALA 0.45%
$9,041
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ALA | COTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,371 | $559 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,205 | $2,077 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,829 | $5,788 |
- 0.45%ALA, cheaper
- 0.77%COTG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
ALA 7th cheapest of 312 funds
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
ALA vs COTG Dividends
- ALA None
- COTG None
Distribution history
ALA vs COTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ALA COTG 38.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ALA COTG 0.12
- Worst fall
- ALA COTG −36.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ALA 0.91COTG −0.04
ALA and COTG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
