UNHG ranks 2nd and COTG 5th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
COTG vs UNHG
13.5%by weight
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.77%0.77%
UNHG 7.3×the volume
98.8K726K
COTG vs UNHG Performance
+13.5%+8.4%
- COTG 0.77%
- UNHG 0.77%
- COTG $10M
- UNHG $63M
- COTG +13.5%, better
- UNHG +8.4%
- COTG 4
- UNHG 5
- COTG 98.8K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- COTG $14.21
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | COTG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | B60 |
| Mission | A91Higher | A90 |
| Risk | A85Higher | A83 |
| Tradability | A77 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B55 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. COTG and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
COTGB
UNHGA
In short
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
COTG vs UNHG Holdings
How COTG and UNHG differ
13.5%
Shared holdings make up 14.9% of COTG and 13.5% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Holdings13.5%
Sector
No Sector split for COTG and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in COTGMore in UNHG | COTG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- COTG214.9%
- UNHG213.5%
- COTG1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- COTG
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in COTG0
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in COTG
0 securities, 0.0% of COTG by weight
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in COTGMore in UNHG | COTG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | COTG +1.42 points | 14.89% | 13.47% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
COTG vs UNHG Cost
Same expense ratio
$14,829
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | COTG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,371 | $1,371 |
| 20 | $5,205 | $5,205 |
| 30 | $14,829 | $14,829 |
- 0.77%COTG
- 0.77%UNHG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
COTG vs UNHG Dividends
- COTG None
- UNHG
- COTG
- UNHG $1.90
- COTG
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- COTG
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- COTG
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
COTG vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- COTG 38.3%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- COTG 0.12UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- COTG −36.4%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- COTG −0.04UNHG 5.19
COTG and UNHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
