PANG ranks 3rd and AMDL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMDL vs PANG
PANG −1.11pt a year
1.87%0.76%
AMDL 60.0×the volume
2.68M44.6K
AMDL vs PANG Performance
+114.9%+91.6%
- AMDL 1.87%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- AMDL $1.03B
- PANG $9M
- AMDL +114.9%, better
- PANG +91.6%
- AMDL 2
- PANG 4
- AMDL 2.68M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- AMDL $65.19
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMDL | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F1 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A97Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C49 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A97Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A84Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMDL and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMDLC
PANGA
In short
AMDL A pure bet on one chip stock, doubled. AMDL aims to deliver twice AMD's daily move, resets the clock every day, and is one of the busiest names in the leveraged single-stock aisle.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
AMDL The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.'s common stock, before fees and expenses.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMDL vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMDL vs PANG Cost
Overpaying AMDL vs PANG
$16,613
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMDL 1.87%
$31,269
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMDL | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,180 | $1,353 | $1,827 |
| 20 | $11,499 | $5,142 | $6,357 |
| 30 | $31,269 | $14,656 | $16,613 |
- 1.87%AMDL
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
AMDL 311th cheapest of 315 funds
AMDL vs PANG Dividends
- AMDL None
- PANG
- AMDL
- PANG $1.30
- AMDL
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- AMDL
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- AMDL
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
AMDL vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMDL 178.2%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMDL 0.72PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- AMDL −88.6%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AMDL 8.34PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.87% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.87% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.87% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.