PANG ranks 3rd and AMKX 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMKX vs PANG
0.0%by weight
AMKX −0.31pt a year
0.45%0.76%
PANG 18.5×the volume
2.41K44.6K
AMKX vs PANG Performance
−46.6%+7.0%
- AMKX 0.45%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- AMKX $0
- PANG $9M
- AMKX
- PANG +91.6%
- AMKX 1
- PANG 4
- AMKX 2.41K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- AMKX $5.77
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMKX | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | D32 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | F16 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F14 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMKX and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMKXC
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMKX vs PANG Holdings
How AMKX and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AMKX and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AMKX and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for AMKX.
Concentration
- AMKX198.4%
- PANG208.4%
- AMKX0
- PANG1
Asset class
- AMKX
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AMKX0
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in AMKX
0 securities, 0.0% of AMKX by weight
Only in PANG
1 security, 8.4% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.43%
Weight gaps
AMKX and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMKX vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs AMKX
$5,615
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMKX 0.45%
$9,041
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMKX | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,353 | $541 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $5,142 | $2,014 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $14,656 | $5,615 |
- 0.45%AMKX, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
AMKX 7th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
AMKX vs PANG Dividends
- AMKX None
- PANG
- AMKX
- PANG $1.30
- AMKX
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- AMKX
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- AMKX
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
AMKX vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMKX PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMKX PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- AMKX PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AMKX 0.00PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.