KWIN ranks 1st and AMYY 53rd of 71 funds in the Single-Stock Option Income Category.
AMYY vs KWIN
KWIN −0.67pt a year
1.18%0.51%
AMYY 1.7×the volume
24.4K14K
AMYY vs KWIN Performance
+8.2%+2.9%
- AMYY 1.18%
- KWIN 0.51%, better
- AMYY $9M
- KWIN $63M
- AMYY +9.1%
- KWIN
- AMYY 126.37%
- KWIN
- AMYY 6
- KWIN 55
- AMYY 24.4K sh, better
- KWIN 14K sh
- AMYY $12.58
- KWIN $25.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMYY | KWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A100Higher |
| Mission | F20 | |
| Risk | A77 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | A70 | A70 |
| Holdings | A88 | |
| Durability | B58 | B68Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Option Income funds
Same Category. AMYY and KWIN are both graded against the same 71 Single-Stock Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMYYD
KWINA
In short
AMYY Most AMD income funds sell calls on the stock. AMYY flips it: the fund sells puts on a leveraged ETF tracking twice AMD's daily move, where premiums run richer, and pays the proceeds out as income.
KWIN An income fund built for investors who can't own interest. KWIN holds stocks, then sells calls and buys puts on each one, aiming for a delta-neutral book whose payout comes from options premium instead of a coupon.
Stated mandate
AMYY AMYY seeks income by selling options, primarily put options, on leveraged ETFs designed to deliver twice the daily performance of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. It also seeks indirect exposure to that leveraged ETF, with gains subject to a cap.
KWIN KWIN seeks alternative option income by holding long positions in selected equities while selling calls and buying puts against each position. The strategy is intended to produce a delta-neutral portfolio and is marketed as an alternative to traditional interest income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMYY vs KWIN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMYY vs KWIN Cost
Overpaying AMYY vs KWIN
$11,378
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMYY 1.18%
$21,543
KWIN 0.51%
$10,165
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMYY | KWIN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,065 | $918 | $1,147 |
| 20 | $7,697 | $3,527 | $4,170 |
| 30 | $21,543 | $10,165 | $11,378 |
- 1.18%AMYY
- 0.51%KWIN, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Option Income funds
- Median 1.04%
KWIN cheapest of 71 funds
AMYY 48th cheapest of 71 funds
AMYY vs KWIN Dividends
- AMYY 126.37%
- KWIN
- AMYY $15.31
- KWIN None
- AMYY $0.16
- KWIN
- AMYY Oct 30, 2026
- KWIN
- AMYY Pays Nov 3, 2026
- KWIN
- AMYY Weekly
- KWIN
Distribution history
AMYY vs KWIN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMYY 26.1%KWIN
- Return per unit of risk
- AMYY 0.88KWIN
- Worst fall
- AMYY −16.8%KWIN
- Market sensitivity
- AMYY 1.13KWIN 0.001
Popular comparisons
- 1.18% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.78%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.18% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.51% · 0.99%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.