PANG ranks 3rd and AMZU 37th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
AMZU vs PANG
PANG −0.23pt a year
0.99%0.76%
AMZU 56.0×the volume
2.5M44.6K
AMZU vs PANG Performance
−21.7%+91.6%
- AMZU 0.99%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- AMZU $300M
- PANG $9M
- AMZU −21.7%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- AMZU 6.39%
- PANG
- AMZU 9
- PANG 4
- AMZU 2.5M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- AMZU $31.96
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A86 | A94Higher |
| Risk | B61 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A87Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. AMZU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZUB
PANGA
In short
AMZU The straight-ahead 2x Amazon trade: twice AMZN's daily move, reset every night, with no options overlay or income wrapper bolted on. Live since 2022 and one of the tighter builds in a crowded leveraged single-stock field.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
AMZU The Fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to twice the daily performance of Amazon.com, Inc. common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZU vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying AMZU vs PANG
$3,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZU 0.99%
$18,525
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,353 | $393 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $5,142 | $1,423 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $14,656 | $3,869 |
- 0.99%AMZU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
AMZU 169th cheapest of 315 funds
AMZU vs PANG Dividends
- AMZU 6.39%
- PANG
- AMZU $1.99
- PANG
- AMZU $0.19
- PANG $1.30
- AMZU Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- AMZU Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- AMZU Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
AMZU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZU 58.6%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZU 0.44PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- AMZU −55.6%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZU 2.92PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.