PANG ranks 3rd and APHG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
APHG vs PANG
8.4%by weight
PANG −0.23pt a year
0.99%0.76%
PANG 8.8×the volume
5.1K44.6K
APHG vs PANG Performance
−9.9%+7.0%
- APHG 0.99%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- APHG $0
- PANG $9M
- APHG
- PANG +91.6%
- APHG 3
- PANG 4
- APHG 5.1K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- APHG $13.32
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | APHG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | C41 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D26 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. APHG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
APHGC
PANGA
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
APHG vs PANG Holdings
How APHG and PANG differ
8.4%
Shared holdings make up 19.3% of APHG and 8.4% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings8.4%
Sector
No Sector split for APHG and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in APHGMore in PANG | APHG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- APHG219.3%
- PANG208.4%
- APHG1
- PANG1
Asset class
- APHG
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in APHG0
- In both1
- Only in PANG0
Only in APHG
0 securities, 0.0% of APHG by weight
Only in PANG
0 securities, 0.0% of PANG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in APHGMore in PANG | APHG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | APHG +10.92 points | 19.35% | 8.43% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
APHG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying APHG vs PANG
$3,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
APHG 0.99%
$18,525
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | APHG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,353 | $393 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $5,142 | $1,423 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $14,656 | $3,869 |
- 0.99%APHG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
APHG 169th cheapest of 315 funds
APHG vs PANG Dividends
- APHG None
- PANG
- APHG
- PANG $1.30
- APHG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- APHG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- APHG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
APHG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- APHG PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- APHG PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- APHG PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- APHG −1.02PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.