TSMG ranks 1st and APPX 249th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
APPX vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.60pt a year
1.36%0.76%
APPX 17.9×the volume
1.23M69K
APPX vs TSMG Performance
−93.6%+40.8%
- APPX 1.36%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- APPX $48M
- TSMG $28M
- APPX −93.6%
- TSMG +40.8%, better
- APPX 1
- TSMG 5
- APPX 1.23M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- APPX $6.44
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | APPX | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A79 |
| Risk | D26 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | D39 | |
| Durability | A70Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. APPX and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
APPXD
TSMGA
In short
APPX One stock, one day, double the move. APPX aims for 200% of AppLovin's daily return and has tracked that target closely. The trade-off: 1.36% a year, above what most rival 2x single-stock funds charge.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
APPX Seeks daily, before-fee-and-expense results equal to 200% of the daily performance of AppLovin Corp. common shares.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
APPX vs TSMG Holdings
How APPX and TSMG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of APPX and 0.0% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for APPX and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for APPX.
Concentration
- APPX209.1%
- TSMG212.4%
- APPX1
- TSMG1
Asset class
- APPX
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in APPX1
- In both0
- Only in TSMG1
Only in APPX
1 security, 100% of APPX by weight
- Cashusd209.10%
Only in TSMG
1 security, 12.4% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204012.41%
Weight gaps
APPX and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
APPX vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying APPX vs TSMG
$9,604
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
APPX 1.36%
$24,260
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | APPX | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,362 | $1,353 | $1,009 |
| 20 | $8,735 | $5,142 | $3,593 |
| 30 | $24,260 | $14,656 | $9,604 |
- 1.36%APPX
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
APPX 254th cheapest of 315 funds
APPX vs TSMG Dividends
- APPX $9.98
- TSMG $2.73
- APPX Dec 26, 2025
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- APPX Dec 30, 2025
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- APPX Irregular
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
APPX vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- APPX 180.3%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- APPX 0.22TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- APPX −95.3%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- APPX 7.24TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.36% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.36% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.36% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.