Skip to content
etf.net

ARKE vs CPRY

ARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF

ARKEFCboe

Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

CPRYANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CPRY −0.75pt a year

ARKE1.44%CPRY0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

CPRY 11.1×the volume

ARKE805CPRY8.92K

ARKE vs CPRY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.4%ARKE+0.9%CPRY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ARKE +6.4%. CPRY +0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%12.5%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARKE 1.44%
CPRY 0.69%, better
Fund size
ARKE $2M
CPRY $36M
1Y total return
ARKE No data
CPRY +7.9%
Holdings
ARKE 4
CPRY 3
Avg volume (30D)
ARKE 805 sh
CPRY 8.92K sh, better
NAV per share
ARKE $19.83
CPRY $28.40
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARKE: Cost 0, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 17, Holdings 45, Durability 20. CPRY: Cost 78, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 80, Holdings not scored, Durability 65.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARKE, CPRY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARKECPRY
Cost30% weightF0A78Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37A81Higher
Tradability15% weightF17A80Higher
Holdings10% weightC45Not scored
Durability5% weightF20B65Higher

Rank among Other Floor Protected funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARKE and CPRY are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Floor Protected⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

CPRY ranks 1st and ARKE 18th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPRYCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – JanuaryScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACPROCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – OctoberScore 76
  3. Rank 17FKPROKraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETFScore 19
  4. Rank 18FARKEARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETFScore 14

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARKEFARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF

CPRYACalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

In short

ARKE No data

CPRY Small caps with a hard floor. CPRY uses options to target 100% of your starting value back over a one-year outcome period, before fees. The trade: a ceiling on the upside, reset each January.

Stated mandate

ARKE No data

CPRY The fund seeks point-to-point exposure to the positive price return of the Russell 2000 up to a defined cap, while providing 100% downside protection over the one-year outcome period before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

ARKE No data

  • CPRY Full protection, not a partial buffer: the design targets 100% downside protection over the one-year outcome period, before fees and expenses.
  • The floor sits on small caps. The reference asset is the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM), the choppier end of US equities.
  • At 0.69%, it undercuts the 0.89% median fee among protection funds, and it sits among the strongest implementations in that peer group.
  • Part of a dated series: siblings start their outcome periods in July (CPRJ) and October (CPRO), so January is not the only entry point.

Worth knowing

ARKE No data

  • CPRY Protection is point to point and before the 0.69% fee. Buy mid-period or sell early and you get whatever the options package is worth that day.
  • Upside stops at a cap that resets with each new January outcome period. Anything the Russell 2000 gains above it stays with the index.
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads can run wider than on big index ETFs.

Full ARKE profile⁠

Full CPRY profile⁠

ARKE vs CPRY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARKE vs CPRY Cost

Overpaying ARKE vs CPRY

$11,997

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARKE 1.44%

    $25,426

  • CPRY 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARKE 1.44%
  • CPRY 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ARKE $25,426CPRY $13,429

Year by year

YearARKECPRYOverpaying
10$2,493$1,232$1,261
20$9,186$4,697$4,489
30$25,426$13,429$11,997

Expense ratio

  • 1.44%ARKE
  • 0.69%CPRY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
  • Median 0.79%

CPRY 2nd cheapest of 18 funds

ARKE 18th cheapest of 18 funds

ARKE vs CPRY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
ARKE None
CPRY None

Distribution history

ARKEAll ARKE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CPRYAll CPRY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ARKE vs CPRY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARKE No dataCPRY 2.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARKE No dataCPRY 1.12since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARKE No dataCPRY −3.2%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARKE 0.00CPRY 0.15

Popular comparisons

  • ARKEFvsCPROA

    ARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CPRYAvsCPROA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKEFvsISWNA

    ARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF · Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CPRYAvsISWNA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January · Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKEFvsCPNSA

    ARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF · Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CPRYAvsCPNSA

    Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January · Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.