Skip to content
etf.net

ARKE vs ISWN

ARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF

ARKEFCboe

Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

ISWNANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

ISWN −0.95pt a year

ARKE1.44%ISWN0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

ISWN 2.5×the volume

ARKE805ISWN1.97K

ARKE vs ISWN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.4%ARKE−4.0%ISWN

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ARKE +6.4%. ISWN −4.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%15%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ARKE 1.44%
ISWN 0.49%, better
Fund size
ARKE $2M
ISWN $35M
1Y total return
ARKE No data
ISWN +2.4%
Yield (12M)
ARKE No data
ISWN 3.09%
Holdings
ARKE 4
ISWN 14
Avg volume (30D)
ARKE 805 sh
ISWN 1.97K sh, better
NAV per share
ARKE $19.83
ISWN $21.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARKE: Cost 0, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 17, Holdings 45, Durability 20. ISWN: Cost 100, Risk 39, Mission not scored, Tradability 58, Holdings 53, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARKE, ISWN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARKEISWN
Cost30% weightF0A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37D39Higher
Tradability15% weightF17B58Higher
Holdings10% weightC45C53Higher
Durability5% weightF20A81Higher

Rank among Other Floor Protected funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARKE and ISWN are both graded against the same 18 Other Floor Protected funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Other Floor Protected⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

ISWN ranks 3rd and ARKE 18th of 18 funds in the Other Floor Protected Category.

  1. Rank 1ACPRYCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – JanuaryScore 78
  2. Rank 2ACPROCalamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – OctoberScore 76
  3. Rank 3AISWNAmplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)Score 74
  4. Rank 4ACPNSCalamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – SeptemberScore 71
  5. Rank 17FKPROKraneShares 100% KWEB Defined Outcome January 2027 ETFScore 19
  6. Rank 18FARKEARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETFScore 14

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARKEFARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF

ISWNAAmplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International)

In short

ARKE No data

ISWN Most downside-protection funds pay for the cushion by capping your upside. ISWN skips the cap: roughly 90% sits in Treasuries while about 10% buys long-dated in-the-money calls on EFA, so developed-market exposure arrives through options.

Stated mandate

ARKE No data

ISWN The fund seeks to track a rules-based index combining U.S. Treasury securities with EFA options. Its strategy targets approximately 90% Treasury exposure to cushion severe, rare market disruptions while retaining some participation in EFA gains.

Why people hold it

ARKE No data

  • ISWN At 0.49%, it runs about half the 0.89% median of its downside-protection cohort.
  • No artificial ceiling on gains. Buffer peers like IBUF hand back everything above a set cap each outcome period; ISWN's EFA calls carry no stated cap.amplifyetfs.cominnovatoretfs.com
  • The rare international take on the structure: ISWN is the EAFE sibling of Amplify's SWAN, swapping SPY options for EFA options to reach developed markets outside the US.amplifyetfs.com
  • Rules-based, not a judgment call. It tracks the S-Network International BlackSwan Index, which sets the Treasury and option mix on a fixed schedule.amplifyetfs.com

Worth knowing

ARKE No data

  • ISWN The Treasury sleeve targets the duration of the 10-year note, so interest rates steer results as much as EAFE does.amplifyetfs.com
  • The cushion is indirect. It leans on Treasuries holding up when stocks fall, not a contractual buffer, so no fixed percentage of downside is defined.amplifyetfs.com
  • Among the smaller and more thinly traded funds in its category, which can widen bid-ask spreads on entry and exit.

Full ARKE profile⁠

Full ISWN profile⁠

ARKE vs ISWN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARKE vs ISWN Cost

Overpaying ARKE vs ISWN

$15,634

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARKE 1.44%

    $25,426

  • ISWN 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARKE 1.44%
  • ISWN 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ARKE $25,426ISWN $9,792

Year by year

YearARKEISWNOverpaying
10$2,493$883$1,610
20$9,186$3,394$5,792
30$25,426$9,792$15,634

Expense ratio

  • 1.44%ARKE
  • 0.49%ISWN, cheaper
  • Middle half of Other Floor Protected funds
  • Median 0.79%

ISWN cheapest of 18 funds

ARKE 18th cheapest of 18 funds

ARKE vs ISWN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ARKE No data
ISWN 3.09%
Payout (12M)
ARKE None
ISWN $0.65
Last payment
ARKE No data
ISWN $0.17
Ex-dividend
ARKE No data
ISWN Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
ARKE No data
ISWN Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
ARKE No data
ISWN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

ARKEAll ARKE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ISWNQuarterly · 23 paymentsAll ISWN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 23 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Mar 29, 2021 $0.0067; Jun 28, 2021 $0.02; Sep 28, 2021 $0.03; Dec 29, 2021 $0.13; Mar 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 28, 2022 $0.07; Sep 28, 2022 $0.12; Dec 28, 2022 $0.13; Mar 29, 2023 $0.14; Jun 28, 2023 $0.14; Sep 27, 2023 $0.14; Dec 27, 2023 $0.14; Mar 26, 2024 $0.14; Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Sep 27, 2024 $0.15; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Mar 28, 2025 $0.16; Jun 27, 2025 $0.15; Sep 29, 2025 $0.15; Dec 30, 2025 $0.16; Mar 30, 2026 $0.16; Jun 29, 2026 $0.16; Sep 29, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

ARKE vs ISWN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARKE No dataISWN 12.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARKE No dataISWN 0.54
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARKE No dataISWN −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARKE 0.00ISWN 0.58

Popular comparisons

  • ARKEFvsCPRYA

    ARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ISWNAvsCPRYA

    Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International) · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – January

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKEFvsCPROA

    ARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ISWNAvsCPROA

    Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International) · Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF – October

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKEFvsCPNSA

    ARK DIET Q3 Buffer ETF · Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ISWNAvsCPNSA

    Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (International) · Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF – September

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.