IPAY ranks 3rd and ARKF 7th of 7 funds in the Fintech & Payments Category.
ARKF vs IPAY
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.75%0.75%
ARKF 2.0×the volume
125K62.6K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
−4.7%−4.7%
ARKF vs IPAY Performance
−21.3%−21.4%
- ARKF 0.75%
- IPAY 0.75%
- ARKF $831M
- IPAY $152M
- ARKF −18.3%
- IPAY −3.6%, better
- ARKF 0.10%
- IPAY 0.82%, better
- ARKF 39
- IPAY 42
- ARKF 125K sh, better
- IPAY 62.6K sh
- ARKF $41.90
- IPAY $50.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARKF | IPAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | F17 |
| Mission | C44 | |
| Risk | D28 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | D33 | C53Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | A74 |
Rank among Fintech & Payments funds
Same Category. ARKF and IPAY are both graded against the same 7 Fintech & Payments funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARKFD
IPAYC
In short
ARKF ARK's bet that finance gets rebuilt on rails of code: an actively managed, global basket of blockchain and fintech names picked by analysts rather than an index rulebook, running since 2019.
IPAY The payments purist. IPAY tracks a global index of card networks, processors and wallet apps, roughly 40 names deep, while most fintech funds spread into lending, crypto and banking software.
Stated mandate
ARKF The fund seeks long-term capital growth through active investment, primarily in domestic and foreign equity securities connected to blockchain and financial-technology innovation.
IPAY IPAY seeks returns that generally track the Nasdaq CTA Global Digital Payments Index before fees and expenses. It follows a passive/indexing approach rather than trying to outperform the index or moving temporarily defensive.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARKF vs IPAY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARKF vs IPAY Cost
Same expense ratio
$14,482
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARKF 0.75%
$14,482
IPAY 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARKF | IPAY |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,336 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,078 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,482 |
- 0.75%ARKF
- 0.75%IPAY
- Middle half of Fintech & Payments funds
- Median 0.55%
ARKF 6th cheapest of 7 funds
IPAY 6th cheapest of 7 funds
ARKF vs IPAY Dividends
- ARKF 0.10%
- IPAY 0.82%, better
- ARKF $0.04
- IPAY $0.41
- ARKF $0.04
- IPAY $0.41
- ARKF Dec 26, 2025
- IPAY Dec 30, 2025
- ARKF Dec 29, 2025
- IPAY Dec 31, 2025
- ARKF Irregular
- IPAY Annual
Distribution history
ARKF vs IPAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ARKF
- IPAY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARKF 38.1%IPAY 23.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ARKF 0.81, betterIPAY 0.39
- Worst fall
- ARKF −74.7%IPAY −46.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ARKF 2.04IPAY 1.28
ARKF and IPAY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.55%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


