PANG ranks 3rd and ARMG 18th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ARMG vs PANG
8.4%by weight
PANG −0.02pt a year
0.78%0.76%
ARMG 23.0×the volume
1.03M44.6K
ARMG vs PANG Performance
−30.9%+91.6%
- ARMG 0.78%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- ARMG $51M
- PANG $9M
- ARMG −30.9%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- ARMG 5
- PANG 4
- ARMG 1.03M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- ARMG $9.96
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARMG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C52 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B69Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ARMG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARMGB
PANGA
In short
ARMG Arm Holdings, doubled by the day. ARMG aims for 200% of ARM's daily move, resets every night, and charges 0.78% a year, below the typical fee in the single-stock leveraged crowd.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
ARMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Arm Holdings plc stock, before fees and expenses.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARMG vs PANG Holdings
How ARMG and PANG differ
8.4%
Shared holdings make up 15.4% of ARMG and 8.4% of PANG.
Level by level
- Holdings8.4%
Sector
No Sector split for ARMG and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ARMGMore in PANG | ARMG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- ARMG215.4%
- PANG208.4%
- ARMG1
- PANG1
Asset class
- ARMG
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ARMG0
- In both1
- Only in PANG0
Only in ARMG
0 securities, 0.0% of ARMG by weight
Only in PANG
0 securities, 0.0% of PANG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in ARMGMore in PANG | ARMG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | ARMG +6.93 points | 15.36% | 8.43% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARMG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying ARMG vs PANG
$346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARMG 0.78%
$15,002
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARMG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,353 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $5,142 | $126 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $14,656 | $346 |
- 0.78%ARMG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
ARMG 142nd cheapest of 315 funds
ARMG vs PANG Dividends
- ARMG $0.28
- PANG $1.30
- ARMG Dec 30, 2025
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- ARMG Jan 2, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- ARMG Irregular
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
ARMG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARMG 175.0%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARMG 0.47PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- ARMG −84.1%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ARMG 6.89PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.