PANG ranks 3rd and ASMU 37th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ASMU vs PANG
PANG −0.21pt a year
0.97%0.76%
ASMU 2.6×the volume
116K44.6K
ASMU vs PANG Performance
−13.3%+7.0%
- ASMU 0.97%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- ASMU $11M
- PANG $9M
- ASMU
- PANG +91.6%
- ASMU 10
- PANG 4
- ASMU 116K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- ASMU $27.29
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASMU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A94Higher |
| Risk | A78Higher | A74 |
| Tradability | C54 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B62Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ASMU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASMUB
PANGA
In short
ASMU Two times the daily move of ASML, the one company making the EUV lithography machines cutting-edge chips require. Direxion's 2x wrapper resets every day, so it tracks a one-day objective rather than a long-run one.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
ASMU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of ASML Holding N.V.'s common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASMU vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASMU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying ASMU vs PANG
$3,542
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASMU 0.97%
$18,198
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASMU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,353 | $359 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,142 | $1,301 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $14,656 | $3,542 |
- 0.97%ASMU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
ASMU 156th cheapest of 315 funds
ASMU vs PANG Dividends
- ASMU $0.22
- PANG $1.30
- ASMU Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- ASMU Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- ASMU Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
ASMU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASMU PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ASMU PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- ASMU PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ASMU 1.84PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.