Skip to content
etf.net

ASUP vs UNHG

T-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF

ASUPFCboe

Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

UNHGANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

UNHG −0.73pt a year

ASUP1.50%UNHG0.77%

Avg volume · 30D

UNHG 27.0×the volume

ASUP26.9KUNHG726K

ASUP vs UNHG Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−70.1%ASUP−11.0%UNHG

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. ASUP −70.1%. UNHG −11.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−25%25%50%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
ASUP 1.50%
UNHG 0.77%, better
Fund size
ASUP $0
UNHG $63M
1Y total return
ASUP No data
UNHG +8.4%
Holdings
ASUP 2
UNHG 5
Avg volume (30D)
ASUP 26.9K sh
UNHG 726K sh, better
NAV per share
ASUP $2.89
UNHG $20.57
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ASUP: Cost 11, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 39. UNHG: Cost 60, Risk 83, Mission 90, Tradability 90, Holdings not scored, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for ASUP, UNHG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarASUPUNHG
Cost30% weightF11B60Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA90
Risk15% weightF14A83Higher
Tradability15% weightF18A90Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD39B66Higher

Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ASUP and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Single-Stock Long Leveraged⁠

Category · 315 funds
See all 315 ›

UNHG ranks 2nd and ASUP 306th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.

  1. Rank 1ATSMGLeverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETFScore 73
  2. Rank 2AUNHGLeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETFScore 72
  3. Rank 3AOKTGLeverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 305FSMUPT-Rex 2x Long SMR Daily Target ETFScore 17
  5. Rank 306FASUPT-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETFScore 15
  6. Rank 307FTEUPT-REX 2X Long TE Daily Target ETFScore 14
  7. FIXXNot yet graded
  8. FLELNot yet graded
  9. LITGNot yet graded
  10. MUGNot yet graded
  11. MXLLNot yet graded
  12. STLLNot yet graded
  13. STMXNot yet graded
  14. VIAGNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ASUPFT-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF

UNHGALeverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF

In short

ASUP No data

UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.

Stated mandate

ASUP No data

UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

ASUP No data

  • UNHG At 0.77%, the cheaper of the only two 2x UNH funds: Direxion's UNHU runs 0.97% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027. Both sit below the category's typical fee.
  • First to the 2x UNH trade, listed July 2025, months before Direxion's version arrived in March 2026. It trades actively for a single-stock leveraged fund.direxion.com
  • Exposure comes from total return swaps reset at each close, and day-to-day it has stayed close to its 2x target. One of the better-built funds in a crowded bull field.leverageshares.comsec.gov

Worth knowing

ASUP No data

  • UNHG Daily reset means multi-day results depend on the path UNH takes, not just its direction. Choppy stretches can erode value even if the stock ends where it started.leverageshares.com
  • Swap-based exposure carries counterparty risk, and everything rides on one managed-care company's news, from earnings to policy headlines.leverageshares.com
  • Listed in 2025, so there is little history to judge it across a full market cycle.

Full ASUP profile⁠

Full UNHG profile⁠

ASUP vs UNHG Holdings

How ASUP and UNHG differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ASUP and 0.0% of UNHG.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for ASUP and UNHG.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ASUP and UNHG, widest gap first
CountryMore in ASUPMore in UNHG
United StatesSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ASUP203.7%
  • UNHG213.5%

Securities held

  • ASUP1
  • UNHG1

Asset class

ASUP
Equity
UNHG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ASUP1
  • In both0
  • Only in UNHG1

Only in ASUP

1 security, 3.4% of ASUP by weight

  • First American Government Obli First Am Gov Oblig X3.40%

Only in UNHG

1 security, 13.5% of UNHG by weight

  • First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204013.47%

Weight gaps

ASUP and UNHG share no securities.

All 3 ASUP holdings⁠All 5 UNHG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ASUP vs UNHG Cost

Overpaying ASUP vs UNHG

$11,454

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ASUP 1.50%

    $26,283

  • UNHG 0.77%

    $14,829

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ASUP 1.50%
  • UNHG 0.77%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ASUP $26,283UNHG $14,829

Year by year

YearASUPUNHGOverpaying
10$2,590$1,371$1,219
20$9,519$5,205$4,314
30$26,283$14,829$11,454

Expense ratio

  • 1.50%ASUP
  • 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
  • Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
  • Median 0.97%

UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds

ASUP 271st cheapest of 315 funds

ASUP vs UNHG Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
ASUP None
UNHG No data
Last payment
ASUP No data
UNHG $1.90
Ex-dividend
ASUP No data
UNHG Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
ASUP No data
UNHG Jan 2, 2026
Frequency
ASUP No data
UNHG Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ASUPAll ASUP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

UNHGIrregular · 1 paymentAll UNHG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $1.90. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$22026YTD

ASUP vs UNHG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ASUP No dataUNHG 98.1%since Aug 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ASUP No dataUNHG 0.90since Aug 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ASUP No dataUNHG −57.1%since Jul 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ASUP 9.67UNHG 5.19

ASUP and UNHG in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • ASUPFvsTSMGA

    T-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UNHGAvsTSMGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ASUPFvsOKTGA

    T-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UNHGAvsOKTGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long OKTA Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ASUPFvsPANGA

    T-REX 2X Long ASTS Daily Target ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.50% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • UNHGAvsPANGA

    Leverage Shares 2x Long UNH Daily ETF · Leverage Shares 2x Long PANW Daily ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.77% · 0.76%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.