AUGC ranks 58th and XTR 58th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
AUGC vs XTR
0.0%by weight
XTR −0.05pt a year
0.30%0.25%
XTR 1.7×the volume
9691.64K
AUGC vs XTR Performance
−3.2%−4.5%
- AUGC 0.30%
- XTR 0.25%, better
- AUGC $1M
- XTR $5M
- AUGC
- XTR +6.1%
- AUGC
- XTR 16.85%
- AUGC 4
- XTR 506
- AUGC 969 sh
- XTR 1.64K sh, better
- AUGC $25.42
- XTR $28.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGC | XTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | F4 | F13Higher |
| Holdings | A90 | |
| Durability | F0 | C46Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. AUGC and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUGCC
XTRC
In short
XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.
Stated mandate
XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUGC vs XTR Holdings
How AUGC and XTR differ
0.0%
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in AUGCMore in XTR | Gap | AUGC | XTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | XTR +0.4 points | 40.1% | 40.5% | |
| Health Care | AUGC +0.2 points | 9.4% | 9.2% | |
| Industrials | AUGC +0.1 points | 7.6% | 7.5% | |
| Financials | AUGC +0.1 points | 11.3% | 11.2% | |
| Consumer Staples | AUGC +0.1 points | 4.4% | 4.3% | |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% | |
| Communication | XTR +0.1 points | 9.9% | 9.9% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% | |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% | |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% | |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AUGCMore in XTR | Gap | AUGC | XTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% | |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% | |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- AUGC102.9%
- XTR37.5%
- AUGC3
- XTR505
Asset class
- AUGC
- Stocks
- XTR
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in AUGC3
- In both0
- Only in XTR505
Only in AUGC
3 securities, 100% of AUGC by weight
- Spy 07/30/2027 151.53 C85.02%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202712.24%
- Spy 07/30/2027 757.67 P4.19%
Only in XTR
505 securities, 99.9% of XTR by weight
- Apple Inc7.68%
- NVIDIA Corp7.29%
- Microsoft Corp6.20%
- Amazon.com Inc3.93%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A2.55%
- Broadcom Inc2.33%
- Meta Platforms Inc2.09%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C2.05%
- Eli Lilly & Co1.70%
- Tesla Inc1.63%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc-Cl B1.63%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co1.41%
- Micron Technology Inc1.34%
- Advanced Micro Devices1.20%
- Visa Inc-Class A Shares1.12%
- Exxonmobil Holdings Corp1.05%
- Johnson & Johnson1.00%
- Walmart Inc0.86%
- Mastercard Inc - A0.82%
- AbbVie Inc0.78%
- Costco Wholesale Corp0.70%
- Chevron Corp0.65%
- Cisco Systems Inc0.61%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A0.59%
- Procter & Gamble Co/The0.59%
- Coca-Cola Co/The0.56%
- Merck & Co. Inc.0.56%
- UnitedHealth Group Inc0.55%
- Home Depot Inc0.54%
- Ge Aerospace0.52%
- Bank of America Corp0.50%
- Philip Morris International0.50%
- Applied Materials Inc0.44%
- Intel Corp0.43%
- Texas Instruments Inc0.43%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.43%
- Netflix Inc0.42%
- Lam Research Corp0.41%
- Caterpillar Inc0.41%
- Rtx Corporation0.40%
- Wells Fargo & Co0.40%
- Goldman Sachs Group Inc0.40%
- Amgen Inc0.39%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.39%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A0.37%
- Oracle Corp0.37%
- Linde PLC0.36%
- Intl Business Machines Corp0.36%
- Morgan Stanley0.35%
- Ge Vernova Inc0.34%
Weight gaps
AUGC and XTR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGC vs XTR Cost
Overpaying AUGC vs XTR
$990
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGC 0.30%
$6,149
XTR 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGC | XTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $455 | $90 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $1,769 | $344 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $5,159 | $990 |
- 0.30%AUGC
- 0.25%XTR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
XTR cheapest of 77 funds
AUGC 2nd cheapest of 77 funds
AUGC vs XTR Dividends
- AUGC
- XTR 16.85%
- AUGC None
- XTR $4.69
- AUGC
- XTR $0.08
- AUGC
- XTR Jun 29, 2026
- AUGC
- XTR Jul 2, 2026
- AUGC
- XTR Twice a year
Distribution history
AUGC vs XTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGC XTR 11.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGC XTR 1.19
- Worst fall
- AUGC XTR −20.8%
- Market sensitivity
- AUGC 0.00XTR 0.94
AUGC and XTR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

