AUGP ranks 2nd and SIXO 13th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
AUGP vs SIXO
0.0%by weight
AUGP −0.24pt a year
0.50%0.74%
SIXO 1.7×the volume
7.43K12.3K
AUGP vs SIXO Performance
+10.8%+7.0%
- AUGP 0.50%, better
- SIXO 0.74%
- AUGP $38M
- SIXO $118M
- AUGP +10.8%, better
- SIXO +7.0%
- AUGP 4
- SIXO 3
- AUGP 7.43K sh
- SIXO 12.3K sh, better
- AUGP $33.29
- SIXO $35.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGP | SIXO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | B68 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B69Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | D25 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | |
| Durability | D39 | C48Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. AUGP and SIXO are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUGPB
SIXOB
In short
SIXO Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month wait. SIXO runs on six-month outcome periods, April and October, absorbing the first 10% of a drop in the S&P 500 ETF's price in exchange for a cap that resets twice as often.
Stated mandate
SIXO The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each six-month Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and a first-10% downside loss buffer. It invests substantially all assets in FLEX Options referencing that ETF.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUGP vs SIXO Holdings
How AUGP and SIXO differ
0.0%
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in AUGPMore in SIXO | Gap | AUGP | SIXO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | AUGP +0.3 points | 36.7% | 36.4% | |
| Financials | SIXO +0.1 points | 12.5% | 12.6% | |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 5.1% | 5.1% | |
| Health Care | SIXO +0.1 points | 10.5% | 10.6% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 9.7% | 9.7% | |
| Communication | Same weight | 8.8% | 8.8% | |
| Utilities | Same weight | 2.1% | 2.1% | |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% | |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% | |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.5% | 3.5% | |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AUGPMore in SIXO | Gap | AUGP | SIXO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% | |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% | |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- AUGP103.5%
- SIXO102.9%
- AUGP3
- SIXO2
Asset class
- AUGP
- Alternatives
- SIXO
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in AUGP3
- In both0
- Only in SIXO2
Only in AUGP
3 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4796.98%
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.035.69%
- Net Current Assets<0.01%
Only in SIXO
2 securities, 100% of SIXO by weight
- Spy 03/31/2027 5.64 C97.13%
- Spy 03/31/2027 762.55 P5.45%
Weight gaps
AUGP and SIXO share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGP vs SIXO Cost
Overpaying SIXO vs AUGP
$4,328
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGP 0.50%
$9,979
SIXO 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGP | SIXO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,319 | $419 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,015 | $1,555 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,307 | $4,328 |
- 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
- 0.74%SIXO
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds
SIXO 17th cheapest of 77 funds
AUGP vs SIXO Dividends
- AUGP None
- SIXO None
Distribution history
AUGP vs SIXO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGP 6.2%SIXO 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGP 1.31SIXO 0.96
- Worst fall
- AUGP −11.1%SIXO −12.0%
- Market sensitivity
- AUGP 0.54SIXO 0.52
AUGP and SIXO in the news
Filings Digest
AllianzIM launches OCTI and resets October buffer terms

Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.