AUGP vs XIDE: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

AUGPBCboe

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December

XIDECCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

AUGP −0.35pt a year

AUGP0.50%XIDE0.85%

Avg volume · 30D

AUGP 2.2×the volume

AUGP7.35KXIDE3.32K

AUGP vs XIDE Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+9.9%AUGP+6.4%XIDE

Expense ratio: AUGP 0.50%, better; XIDE 0.85%
Fund size: AUGP $38M; XIDE $20M
1Y total return: AUGP +9.9%, better; XIDE +6.4%
Yield (12M): AUGP No data; XIDE 6.80%
Holdings: AUGP 4; XIDE 4
Avg volume (30D): AUGP 7.35K sh, better; XIDE 3.32K sh
NAV per share: AUGP $33.89; XIDE $30.36
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for AUGP, XIDE, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	AUGP	XIDE
Cost30% weight	A91Higher	F11
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	A72	A74Higher
Tradability15% weight	F24	C48Higher
Holdings10% weight	Not scored	B62
Durability5% weight	D38	C46Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. AUGP and XIDE are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds

See all 77 ›

AUGP ranks 2nd and XIDE 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
Rank 57CPQVPGIM S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer 5 ETFScore 40
Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGPBPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

XIDECFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December

In short

AUGP No data

XIDE Most buffer funds swap upside for a cap. This one swaps it away entirely: it sells at-the-money calls on its S&P 500 reference fund, buffers the first 10% of that fund's losses, and pays the option premium out monthly.

Stated mandate

AUGP No data

XIDE The Fund seeks approximately 7.08% annualized income before fees and expenses while buffering the first 10% of losses of its underlying ETF during the December 22, 2025–December 18, 2026 outcome period.

Why people hold it

AUGP No data

XIDE The deal is stated up front: no gains above the reference ETF's price on day one of the period, in exchange for a set income target and a buffer on its first 10% of losses.sec.gov
Premium collected from the calls sits in short-term Treasuries, and the cash goes out monthly rather than piling up until the annual reset.ftportfolios.com
Terms are re-struck every December for a fresh one-year period, so the income target is repriced to market conditions instead of frozen at the 2023 launch level.sec.gov

Worth knowing

AUGP No data

XIDE At 0.85% a year it sits toward the pricier end of the buffer shelf; peers like BUFB (0.10%) and ZALT (0.69%) charge less for their own flavor of 10% protection.
Outcomes are built for the full December-to-December period. Enter mid-period and your starting point differs, and below the buffer, losses track the reference ETF one for one.sec.gov
A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads and fill quality matter more here than with the largest names in the buffer aisle.

Full AUGP profile⁠

Full XIDE profile⁠

AUGP vs XIDE Holdings

How AUGP and XIDE differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AUGP and 0.0% of XIDE.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for AUGP.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AUGP and XIDE, widest gap first
Country	More in AUGPMore in XIDE	AUGP	XIDE
United States	Same weight	99.5%	99.5%
Switzerland	Same weight	0.3%	0.3%
China	Same weight	0.1%	0.1%
Mexico	Same weight	0.1%	0.1%
Ireland	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%
United Kingdom	Same weight	0.0%	0.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

AUGP103.3%
XIDE112.3%

Securities held

AUGP3
XIDE3

Asset class

AUGP: Alternatives
XIDE: Multi-Asset

Holdings

Only in AUGP3
In both0
Only in XIDE3

Only in AUGP

3 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight

4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4798.09%
4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.034.30%
Net Current Assets<0.01%

Only in XIDE

3 securities, 100% of XIDE by weight

2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.07109.78%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 11/27/20261.02%
2026-12-18 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 680.580.54%

Weight gaps

AUGP and XIDE share no securities.

All AUGP holdings⁠All 5 XIDE holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGP vs XIDE Cost

Overpaying XIDE vs AUGP

$6,220

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

AUGP 0.50%
$9,979
XIDE 0.85%
$16,199

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

AUGP 0.50%
XIDE 0.85%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	AUGP	XIDE	Overpaying
10	$900	$1,508	$608
20	$3,460	$5,706	$2,246
30	$9,979	$16,199	$6,220

Expense ratio

0.50%AUGP, cheaper
0.85%XIDE

AUGP0.50%XIDE0.85%

0.25%0.85%

Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Median 0.79%

AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

XIDE 60th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGP vs XIDE Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026

Yield (12M): AUGP No data; XIDE 6.80%
Payout (12M): AUGP None; XIDE $2.05
Last payment: AUGP No data; XIDE $0.16
Ex-dividend: AUGP No data; XIDE Nov 2, 2026
Paid on: AUGP No data; XIDE Pays Nov 3, 2026
Frequency: AUGP No data; XIDE Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2024 to 2026, same scale for both

AUGPAll AUGP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XIDEMonthly · 34 paymentsAll XIDE payments⁠

AUGP vs XIDE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: AUGP 6.2%since Jun 2024XIDE 2.3%since Jan 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: AUGP 1.31since Jun 2024XIDE 0.90since Jan 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: AUGP −11.1%since May 2024XIDE −6.6%since Dec 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: AUGP 0.53XIDE 0.17; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

AUGPBvsZALTA
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.69%
Category
XIDECvsZALTA
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.69%
Category
AUGPBvsTENJB
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.53%
Category
XIDECvsTENJB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.53%
Category
AUGPBvsSIXJB
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.74%
Category
XIDECvsSIXJB
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - December · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
Expense ratio
0.85% · 0.74%
Category