Skip to content

AUMI vs SGDM

Themes Gold Miners ETF

AUMIBNasdaq

Sprott Gold Miners ETF

SGDMBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AUMI −0.11pt a year

AUMI0.35%SGDM0.46%

Avg volume · 30D

SGDM 15.0×the volume

AUMI2.4KSGDM36.1K

AUMI vs SGDM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.1%AUMI+12.4%SGDM

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUMI +6.1%. SGDM +12.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%30%40%50%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUMI 0.35%, better
SGDM 0.46%
Fund size
AUMI $19M
SGDM $568M
1Y total return
AUMI +6.1%
SGDM +12.4%, better
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
SGDM 1.12%, better
Holdings
AUMI 34
SGDM 49
Avg volume (30D)
AUMI 2.4K sh
SGDM 36.1K sh, better
NAV per share
AUMI $81.97
SGDM $64.96
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUMI: Cost 94, Risk 48, Mission 76, Tradability 15, Holdings 78, Durability 22. SGDM: Cost 68, Risk 72, Mission 78, Tradability 56, Holdings 70, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUMI, SGDM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUMISGDM
Cost30% weightA94HigherB68
Mission25% weightA76A78Higher
Risk15% weightC48A72Higher
Tradability15% weightF15B56Higher
Holdings10% weightA78HigherA70
Durability5% weightF22B60Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUMI and SGDM are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

SGDM ranks 2nd and AUMI 5th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 1BRINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BSGDMSprott Gold Miners ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BGDXVanEck Gold Miners ETFScore 65
  4. Rank 5BAGMIThemes Silver Miners ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 5BAUMIThemes Gold Miners ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 7BAUAUGlobal X Gold Miners ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUMIBThemes Gold Miners ETF

SGDMBSprott Gold Miners ETF

In short

AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.

SGDM SGDM doesn't just rank gold miners by size. It tracks a custom-factors index of roughly 50 larger miners listed in Canada and the US, and charges 0.46%, under its peer group's median fee.

Stated mandate

AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.

SGDM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which targets larger gold companies listed on Canadian and major U.S. exchanges.

Why people hold it

  • AUMI The "pure" in the index name is a rule: members must generate at least 90% of revenue from gold mining, so copper-and-gold conglomerates and diversified diggers stay out.solactive.comthemesetfs.com
  • A 0.35% fee undercuts the peer-group median and the category's household names, VanEck's GDX (0.51%) and iShares' RING (0.39%).
  • Roughly 30 names, free-float weighted, rebuilt on a set schedule: a concentrated, rules-based way to own the diggers rather than the metal.solactive.com
  • SGDM Fee of 0.46% sits under the median for precious-metals miner funds, and under both GDX (0.51%) and GDXJ (0.52%).
  • Rules-based and named out loud: it follows the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index (SOLGMCFT), and it has stayed close to that stated mandate.
  • Running since 2014, a long life for a thematic fund, and it holds about 50 larger gold companies rather than a sprawling list.
  • Lands in the upper half of the gold and silver miner group in our review, with high confidence in the underlying data.

Worth knowing

  • AUMI Thinly traded and small next to the group's giants, so bid-ask spreads can be wider and big orders can push the price.
  • Concentrated by design and non-diversified: about 30 miners, one commodity, plus mine-level risks like costs, permits and politics.themesetfs.com
  • Launched in December 2023, so the live track record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • SGDM Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads can be wider and larger orders can push the price around.
  • The index sticks to Canadian and major US listings, so gold miners quoted only on other exchanges sit outside the portfolio.
  • One industry, driven by the gold price and how well mines actually run, so the ride is bumpier than a broad stock fund.

Full AUMI profile⁠

Full SGDM profile⁠

AUMI vs SGDM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUMI vs SGDM Cost

Overpaying SGDM vs AUMI

$2,104

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUMI 0.35%

    $7,126

  • SGDM 0.46%

    $9,230

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUMI 0.35%
  • SGDM 0.46%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530SGDM $9,230AUMI $7,126

Year by year

YearAUMISGDMOverpaying
10$634$830$196
20$2,454$3,195$741
30$7,126$9,230$2,104

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
  • 0.46%SGDM
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

AUMI cheapest of 18 funds

SGDM 7th cheapest of 18 funds

AUMI vs SGDM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
SGDM 1.12%, better
Payout (12M)
AUMI $0.80
SGDM $0.73
Last payment
AUMI $0.80
SGDM $0.73
Ex-dividend
AUMI Dec 18, 2025
SGDM Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
AUMI Dec 19, 2025
SGDM Dec 22, 2025
Frequency
AUMI Irregular
SGDM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AUMIIrregular · 2 paymentsAll AUMI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.65; Dec 18, 2025 $0.80. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
SGDMAnnual · 9 paymentsAll SGDM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2017 $0.12; Dec 20, 2018 $0.09; Dec 19, 2019 $0.06; Dec 16, 2020 $0.09; Dec 15, 2021 $0.36; Dec 15, 2022 $0.35; Dec 14, 2023 $0.35; Dec 12, 2024 $0.29; Dec 18, 2025 $0.73. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

AUMI vs SGDM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUMI 43.7%since Jan 2024SGDM 40.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUMI 1.01since Jan 2024SGDM 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUMI −39.8%since Dec 2023SGDM −45.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUMI 0.05SGDM 0.71

AUMI and SGDM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AUMIBvsRINGB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGDMBvsRINGB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsGDXB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGDMBvsGDXB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsSLVPB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SGDMBvsSLVPB

    Sprott Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.46% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.