Skip to content

AUMI vs RING

Themes Gold Miners ETF

AUMIBNasdaq

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

RINGBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

AUMI −0.04pt a year

AUMI0.35%RING0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

RING 269.9×the volume

AUMI2.4KRING649K

AUMI vs RING Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.1%AUMI+10.3%RING

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUMI +6.1%. RING +10.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%30%40%50%60%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUMI 0.35%, better
RING 0.39%
Fund size
AUMI $19M
RING $2.06B
1Y total return
AUMI +6.1%
RING +10.3%, better
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
RING 1.35%, better
Holdings
AUMI 34
RING 49
Avg volume (30D)
AUMI 2.4K sh
RING 649K sh, better
NAV per share
AUMI $81.97
RING $67.07
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUMI: Cost 94, Risk 48, Mission 76, Tradability 15, Holdings 78, Durability 22. RING: Cost 79, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 22, Durability 81.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUMI, RING, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUMIRING
Cost30% weightA94HigherA79
Mission25% weightA76Not scored
Risk15% weightC48B66Higher
Tradability15% weightF15A72Higher
Holdings10% weightA78HigherF22
Durability5% weightF22A81Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUMI and RING are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

RING ranks 1st and AUMI 5th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 1BRINGiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BSGDMSprott Gold Miners ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 5BAGMIThemes Silver Miners ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 5BAUMIThemes Gold Miners ETFScore 62
  5. Rank 7BAUAUGlobal X Gold Miners ETFScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUMIBThemes Gold Miners ETF

RINGBiShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

In short

AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.

RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.

Stated mandate

AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.

RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.

Why people hold it

  • AUMI The "pure" in the index name is a rule: members must generate at least 90% of revenue from gold mining, so copper-and-gold conglomerates and diversified diggers stay out.solactive.comthemesetfs.com
  • A 0.35% fee undercuts the peer-group median and the category's household names, VanEck's GDX (0.51%) and iShares' RING (0.39%).
  • Roughly 30 names, free-float weighted, rebuilt on a set schedule: a concentrated, rules-based way to own the diggers rather than the metal.solactive.com
  • RING At 0.39% a year it charges less than the typical gold-miner fund, and less than VanEck's GDX and GDXJ, the category's best-known names.ishares.com
  • Pure play by design: the index targets companies primarily in the business of gold mining, so you get miners rather than a mixed metals-and-materials basket.ishares.com
  • The mandate is global, not US-only, so the portfolio can reach gold producers listed across developed and emerging markets.ishares.com
  • Live since 2012, a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the strongest builds in its precious-metals miner peer group.

Worth knowing

  • AUMI Thinly traded and small next to the group's giants, so bid-ask spreads can be wider and big orders can push the price.
  • Concentrated by design and non-diversified: about 30 miners, one commodity, plus mine-level risks like costs, permits and politics.themesetfs.com
  • Launched in December 2023, so the live track record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • RING Roughly 40 stocks in a single industry. The largest miners carry real weight, so one company's bad quarter is felt across the fund.ishares.com
  • This is mining equity, not bullion. Alongside the gold price you take on company execution, mine geology, labor and country risk.ishares.com
  • Income is an afterthought here: distributions come once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full AUMI profile⁠

Full RING profile⁠

AUMI vs RING Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUMI vs RING Cost

Overpaying RING vs AUMI

$772

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUMI 0.35%

    $7,126

  • RING 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUMI 0.35%
  • RING 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RING $7,898AUMI $7,126

Year by year

YearAUMIRINGOverpaying
10$634$705$71
20$2,454$2,725$271
30$7,126$7,898$772

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
  • 0.39%RING
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

AUMI cheapest of 18 funds

RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds

AUMI vs RING Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.98%
RING 1.35%, better
Payout (12M)
AUMI $0.80
RING $0.90
Last payment
AUMI $0.80
RING $0.53
Ex-dividend
AUMI Dec 18, 2025
RING Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
AUMI Dec 19, 2025
RING Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
AUMI Irregular
RING Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AUMIIrregular · 2 paymentsAll AUMI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.65; Dec 18, 2025 $0.80. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
RINGTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll RING payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.03; Dec 19, 2017 $0.05; Jun 19, 2018 $0.07; Dec 18, 2018 $0.04; Jun 17, 2019 $0.14; Dec 16, 2019 $0.05; Jun 15, 2020 $0.10; Dec 14, 2020 $0.14; Jun 10, 2021 $0.31; Dec 13, 2021 $0.33; Jun 9, 2022 $0.23; Dec 13, 2022 $0.28; Jun 7, 2023 $0.21; Dec 20, 2023 $0.28; Jun 11, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.22; Jun 16, 2025 $0.24; Dec 16, 2025 $0.38; Jun 15, 2026 $0.53. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

AUMI vs RING Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUMI 43.7%since Jan 2024RING 42.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUMI 1.01since Jan 2024RING 1.01Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUMI −39.8%since Dec 2023RING −47.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUMI 0.05RING 0.94

AUMI and RING in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AUMIBvsSGDMB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsSGDMB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsGDXB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsGDXB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsSLVPB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RINGBvsSLVPB

    iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.