RING ranks 1st and AUMI 5th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.
AUMI vs RING
AUMI −0.04pt a year
0.35%0.39%
RING 269.9×the volume
2.4K649K
AUMI vs RING Performance
+6.1%+10.3%
- AUMI 0.35%, better
- RING 0.39%
- AUMI $19M
- RING $2.06B
- AUMI +6.1%
- RING +10.3%, better
- AUMI 0.98%
- RING 1.35%, better
- AUMI 34
- RING 49
- AUMI 2.4K sh
- RING 649K sh, better
- AUMI $81.97
- RING $67.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUMI | RING |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A79 |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | C48 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | F15 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | A78Higher | F22 |
| Durability | F22 | A81Higher |
Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds
Same Category. AUMI and RING are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUMIB
RINGB
In short
AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.
RING The low-fee way to own the gold diggers. RING holds roughly 40 gold mining companies worldwide for 0.39% a year, undercutting most funds in its niche, and it has been running that playbook since 2012.
Stated mandate
AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.
RING The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index. It invests at least 80% of total assets in securities of companies economically tied to gold exploration.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUMI vs RING Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUMI vs RING Cost
Overpaying RING vs AUMI
$772
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUMI 0.35%
$7,126
RING 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUMI | RING | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $705 | $71 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $2,725 | $271 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $7,898 | $772 |
- 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
- 0.39%RING
- Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
- Median 0.52%
AUMI cheapest of 18 funds
RING 4th cheapest of 18 funds
AUMI vs RING Dividends
- AUMI 0.98%
- RING 1.35%, better
- AUMI $0.80
- RING $0.90
- AUMI $0.80
- RING $0.53
- AUMI Dec 18, 2025
- RING Jun 15, 2026
- AUMI Dec 19, 2025
- RING Jun 18, 2026
- AUMI Irregular
- RING Twice a year
Distribution history
AUMI vs RING Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUMI 43.7%RING 42.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUMI 1.01RING 1.01Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- AUMI −39.8%RING −47.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AUMI 0.05RING 0.94
AUMI and RING in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.46%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.51%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


