ILCV ranks 2nd and AUSF 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
AUSF vs ILCV
ILCV −0.23pt a year
0.27%0.04%
AUSF 2.3×the volume
57.2K24.4K
AUSF +1.4pt
+14.0%+12.6%
AUSF vs ILCV Performance
+92.6%+81.1%
- AUSF 0.27%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- AUSF $905M
- ILCV $1.37B
- AUSF +18.1%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- AUSF 2.65%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- AUSF 191
- ILCV 375
- AUSF 57.2K sh, better
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- AUSF $51.94
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUSF | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B55 | A99Higher |
| Mission | D36 | A82Higher |
| Risk | A75 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | C45 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | B65Higher | D39 |
| Durability | C50 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. AUSF and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUSFC
ILCVA
In short
AUSF Most multifactor ETFs bolt value, momentum and low volatility together at fixed weights. AUSF's index shifts the mix instead, tilting toward whichever of the three its rules favor, across roughly 190 US stocks.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
AUSF The Fund seeks to provide investment results generally corresponding, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Its strategy dynamically allocates among U.S. equity value, momentum, and low-volatility factor exposures.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUSF vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUSF vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying AUSF vs ILCV
$4,708
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUSF 0.27%
$5,557
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUSF | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $491 | $73 | $418 |
| 20 | $1,907 | $288 | $1,619 |
| 30 | $5,557 | $849 | $4,708 |
- 0.27%AUSF
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
AUSF 40th cheapest of 99 funds
AUSF vs ILCV Dividends
- AUSF 2.65%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- AUSF $1.38
- ILCV $1.65
- AUSF $0.33
- ILCV $0.42
- AUSF Aug 5, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- AUSF Aug 10, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- AUSF Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
AUSF vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AUSF
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUSF 13.0%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AUSF 1.24ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- AUSF −14.2%, betterILCV −18.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AUSF 0.66ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.27% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.27% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.