Skip to content

AUSF vs VONV

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF

AUSFCNYSE Arca

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

VONVANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

VONV −0.21pt a year

AUSF0.27%VONV0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

VONV 13.5×the volume

AUSF57.2KVONV774K

5Y return · a year

AUSF +2.3pt

AUSF+14.0%VONV+11.7%

AUSF vs VONV Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+92.6%AUSF+73.8%VONV

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. AUSF +92.6%. VONV +73.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUSF 0.27%
VONV 0.06%, better
Fund size
AUSF $905M
VONV $23.3B
1Y total return
AUSF +18.1%
VONV +28.5%, better
Yield (12M)
AUSF 2.65%, better
VONV 1.53%
Holdings
AUSF 191
VONV 873
Avg volume (30D)
AUSF 57.2K sh
VONV 774K sh, better
NAV per share
AUSF $51.94
VONV $113.44
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUSF: Cost 55, Risk 75, Mission 36, Tradability 45, Holdings 65, Durability 50. VONV: Cost 96, Risk 86, Mission 100, Tradability 60, Holdings 49, Durability 93.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUSF, VONV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUSFVONV
Cost30% weightB55A96Higher
Mission25% weightD36A100Higher
Risk15% weightA75A86Higher
Tradability15% weightC45B60Higher
Holdings10% weightB65HigherC49
Durability5% weightC50A93Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUSF and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VONV ranks 1st and AUSF 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 56CAFLGFirst Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 56CAUSFGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 56CBFORBarron's 400 ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUSFCGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF

VONVAVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

In short

AUSF Most multifactor ETFs bolt value, momentum and low volatility together at fixed weights. AUSF's index shifts the mix instead, tilting toward whichever of the three its rules favor, across roughly 190 US stocks.

VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.

Stated mandate

AUSF The Fund seeks to provide investment results generally corresponding, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Its strategy dynamically allocates among U.S. equity value, momentum, and low-volatility factor exposures.

VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • AUSF At 0.27%, it undercuts the median fee in its multifactor peer group. Not index-fund cheap, but light for a strategy that reshuffles its factor mix.
  • One ticker, three factors. Value, momentum and low volatility are allocated by published index rules, not a manager's discretion.globalxetfs.com
  • The low-volatility sleeve shows up in the numbers: its risk profile screens among the steadier in a crowded multifactor field. Trading since 2018.
  • Roughly 190 US stocks and quarterly distributions, so the payout rhythm is predictable even as the factor blend moves.
  • VONV 0.06% a year, a fraction of the typical fee among factor ETFs. On a rules-based value index there is little room for cleverness, so cost does most of the work.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, not sampling: it owns the index's roughly 900 names and has stayed tightly aligned with the Russell 1000 Value benchmark since launching in 2010.
  • Same Russell benchmark as pricier rivals for less: the Goldman MarketBeta version (GVUS) charges 0.12% to track the identical value index.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, among the easiest in its group to get in and out of, and it distributes quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • AUSF Rotation cuts both ways. The rules read past behavior, so when factor leadership flips quickly the portfolio can be leaning into the market that just ended.
  • Plainer neighbors cost far less: VONV at 0.06%, VYM at 0.04%. The extra fee here buys the rotation machinery, not broader coverage.
  • Mid-size and moderately traded rather than a liquidity giant, so spreads deserve a look on larger orders.
  • VONV One screen, one style. Value only, with no quality or momentum overlay, so the ride follows the value side of the market wherever it goes.vanguard.com
  • This is the entire value bucket, not a best-ideas portfolio. About 900 holdings means results hug the large-cap value category rather than stray from it.
  • Cheaper exists nearby: Vanguard's VYM charges 0.04%, but it screens for dividend yield, a different portfolio than a Russell value index.

Full AUSF profile⁠

Full VONV profile⁠

AUSF vs VONV Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUSF vs VONV Cost

Overpaying AUSF vs VONV

$4,287

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUSF 0.27%

    $5,557

  • VONV 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUSF 0.27%
  • VONV 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530AUSF $5,557VONV $1,270

Year by year

YearAUSFVONVOverpaying
10$491$110$381
20$1,907$432$1,475
30$5,557$1,270$4,287

Expense ratio

  • 0.27%AUSF
  • 0.06%VONV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds

AUSF 40th cheapest of 99 funds

AUSF vs VONV Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUSF 2.65%, better
VONV 1.53%
Payout (12M)
AUSF $1.38
VONV $1.74
Last payment
AUSF $0.33
VONV $0.42
Ex-dividend
AUSF Aug 5, 2026
VONV Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
AUSF Aug 10, 2026
VONV Sep 25, 2026
Frequency
AUSF Quarterly
VONV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AUSFQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll AUSF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Nov 8, 2018 $0.22; Dec 28, 2018 $0.11; Feb 7, 2019 $0.22; May 7, 2019 $0.22; Aug 7, 2019 $0.23; Nov 7, 2019 $0.24; Dec 30, 2019 $0.15; Feb 7, 2020 $0.20; May 7, 2020 $0.18; Aug 7, 2020 $0.16; Nov 6, 2020 $0.16; Dec 30, 2020 $0.06; Feb 5, 2021 $0.16; May 7, 2021 $0.17; Aug 6, 2021 $0.18; Nov 5, 2021 $0.18; Dec 30, 2021 $0.02; Feb 7, 2022 $0.19; May 6, 2022 $0.19; Aug 5, 2022 $0.18; Nov 7, 2022 $0.17; Dec 29, 2022 $0.05; Feb 7, 2023 $0.16; May 5, 2023 $0.16; Aug 7, 2023 $0.18; Nov 7, 2023 $0.18; Feb 7, 2024 $0.18; May 7, 2024 $0.23; Aug 7, 2024 $0.27; Nov 7, 2024 $0.29; Dec 30, 2024 $0.14; Feb 7, 2025 $0.29; May 7, 2025 $0.29; Aug 7, 2025 $0.30; Nov 7, 2025 $0.30; Dec 30, 2025 $0.12; Feb 4, 2026 $0.31; May 6, 2026 $0.33; Aug 5, 2026 $0.33. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
VONVQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VONV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.21; Jun 28, 2017 $0.29; Sep 27, 2017 $0.34; Dec 14, 2017 $0.34; Mar 22, 2018 $0.24; Jun 28, 2018 $0.32; Sep 26, 2018 $0.33; Dec 13, 2018 $0.35; Mar 25, 2019 $0.29; Jun 21, 2019 $0.32; Sep 26, 2019 $0.38; Dec 16, 2019 $0.39; Mar 26, 2020 $0.36; Jun 25, 2020 $0.32; Sep 11, 2020 $0.28; Dec 17, 2020 $0.39; Mar 26, 2021 $0.26; Jun 29, 2021 $0.27; Sep 29, 2021 $0.33; Dec 16, 2021 $0.37; Mar 24, 2022 $0.30; Jun 29, 2022 $0.37; Sep 28, 2022 $0.38; Dec 15, 2022 $0.42; Mar 23, 2023 $0.32; Jun 23, 2023 $0.35; Sep 21, 2023 $0.39; Dec 19, 2023 $0.46; Mar 21, 2024 $0.33; Jun 27, 2024 $0.39; Sep 26, 2024 $0.44; Dec 23, 2024 $0.44; Mar 25, 2025 $0.38; Jun 20, 2025 $0.40; Sep 24, 2025 $0.40; Dec 22, 2025 $0.49; Mar 24, 2026 $0.41; Jun 18, 2026 $0.41; Sep 23, 2026 $0.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

AUSF vs VONV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • AUSF
  • VONV
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: VONV −18.9% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUSF 13.0%VONV 12.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUSF 1.24VONV 1.43, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUSF −14.2%, betterVONV −18.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUSF 0.66VONV 0.85

AUSF and VONV in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AUSFCvsILCVA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.27% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsILCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUSFCvsVYMA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.27% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsVYMA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUSFCvsIMCVA

    Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.27% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VONVAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.