AVLC ranks 1st and BCUS 68th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
AVLC vs BCUS
AVLC −0.55pt a year
0.15%0.70%
AVLC 3.5×the volume
78.8K22.6K
AVLC vs BCUS Performance
+16.4%−0.8%
- AVLC 0.15%, better
- BCUS 0.70%
- AVLC $1.58B
- BCUS $145M
- AVLC +16.4%, better
- BCUS −0.8%
- AVLC 0.87%, better
- BCUS 0.11%
- AVLC 849
- BCUS 31
- AVLC 78.8K sh, better
- BCUS 22.6K sh
- AVLC $90.02
- BCUS $33.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVLC | BCUS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C47 |
| Mission | C45 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A86Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A81Higher | C45 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. AVLC and BCUS are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVLCA
BCUSC
In short
AVLC Active management with index-fund manners: roughly 900 U.S. large caps, with the dial turned toward cheaper, more profitable companies. Avantis charges 0.15% a year to do it.
BCUS Bancreek runs U.S. large caps the old-fashioned way: managers picking the names, with the S&P 500 as the scorecard. It arrived at the end of 2023 and is still small and lightly traded, but it lands in the upper half of a crowded active field.
Stated mandate
AVLC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests broadly in U.S. large-capitalization companies while using active decisions to overweight lower valuations and higher profitability.
BCUS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed and invests primarily in equity securities, with at least 80% of net assets normally invested in U.S.-listed large-capitalization companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVLC vs BCUS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVLC vs BCUS Cost
Overpaying BCUS vs AVLC
$10,469
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVLC 0.15%
$3,137
BCUS 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVLC | BCUS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,250 | $976 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $4,760 | $3,689 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $13,606 | $10,469 |
- 0.15%AVLC, cheaper
- 0.70%BCUS
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
AVLC 6th cheapest of 121 funds
BCUS 63rd cheapest of 121 funds
AVLC vs BCUS Dividends
- AVLC 0.87%, better
- BCUS 0.11%
- AVLC $0.79
- BCUS $0.03
- AVLC $0.19
- BCUS $0.03
- AVLC Sep 8, 2026
- BCUS Dec 30, 2025
- AVLC Sep 10, 2026
- BCUS Dec 31, 2025
- AVLC Quarterly
- BCUS Quarterly
Distribution history
AVLC vs BCUS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVLC 12.7%BCUS 13.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVLC 1.43BCUS 0.39
- Worst fall
- AVLC −19.6%BCUS −18.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AVLC 1.02BCUS 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.