Skip to content

AVLV vs OAKM

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

AVLVANYSE Arca

Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF

OAKMCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AVLV −0.44pt a year

AVLV0.15%OAKM0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

AVLV 6.4×the volume

AVLV1.62MOAKM255K

AVLV vs OAKM Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+30.9%AVLV+18.8%OAKM

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. AVLV +30.9%. OAKM +18.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%25%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AVLV 0.15%, better
OAKM 0.59%
Fund size
AVLV $22.6B
OAKM $1.2B
1Y total return
AVLV +30.9%, better
OAKM +18.8%
Yield (12M)
AVLV 1.09%, better
OAKM 0.60%
Holdings
AVLV 300
OAKM 40
Avg volume (30D)
AVLV 1.62M sh, better
OAKM 255K sh
NAV per share
AVLV $94.04
OAKM $31.22
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AVLV: Cost 98, Risk 60, Mission 87, Tradability 99, Holdings 75, Durability 85. OAKM: Cost 32, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 54, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for AVLV, OAKM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAVLVOAKM
Cost30% weightA98HigherD32
Mission25% weightA87Not scored
Risk15% weightB60HigherD37
Tradability15% weightA99HigherA72
Holdings10% weightA75HigherC54
Durability5% weightA85HigherB60

Rank among US Active Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AVLV and OAKM are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds
See all 64 ›

AVLV ranks 1st and OAKM 36th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 36CJDVLJohn Hancock Discipline Value Select ETFScore 46
  4. Rank 36COAKMOakmark U.S. Large Cap ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 38BLVDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AVLVAAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

OAKMCOakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF

In short

AVLV No data

OAKM Oakmark's value playbook, ETF-wrapped since 2024: an active manager hunting cheap US large caps, with the Russell 1000 Value as a yardstick rather than a blueprint. Active-manager pricing comes with it.

Stated mandate

AVLV No data

OAKM The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Why people hold it

AVLV No data

  • OAKM Genuinely active: picks run on Oakmark's own value philosophy, aiming at long-term capital appreciation, with the Russell 1000 Value as the measuring stick, not the shopping list.
  • No black box: the value screen is named and advertised in the fund's own filings, so you know which process you are hiring.
  • Easy to deal in for a young active fund: it changes hands regularly and ranks near the top of its large-cap value cohort on the cost of getting in and out.
  • One job, plainly stated: US large-cap equity with a value tilt, seeking long-term capital appreciation. Nothing exotic bolted on.

Worth knowing

AVLV No data

  • OAKM At 0.59% a year it costs more than the typical fund in its value cohort, and rules-based rivals like WTV (0.12%) and AVLV (0.15%) charge a fraction of that.
  • Launched in December 2024, so the live record is short and there is limited history behind the risk picture.
  • It currently sits in the lower half of its large-cap value peer group, where cheaper systematic funds hold the top spots.

Full AVLV profile⁠

Full OAKM profile⁠

AVLV vs OAKM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AVLV vs OAKM Cost

Overpaying OAKM vs AVLV

$8,498

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AVLV 0.15%

    $3,137

  • OAKM 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AVLV 0.15%
  • OAKM 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530OAKM $11,635AVLV $3,137

Year by year

YearAVLVOAKMOverpaying
10$274$1,058$784
20$1,071$4,051$2,980
30$3,137$11,635$8,498

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%AVLV, cheaper
  • 0.59%OAKM
  • Middle half of US Active Value funds
  • Median 0.55%

AVLV 2nd cheapest of 64 funds

OAKM 42nd cheapest of 64 funds

AVLV vs OAKM Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
AVLV 1.09%, better
OAKM 0.60%
Payout (12M)
AVLV $1.03
OAKM $0.19
Last payment
AVLV $0.23
OAKM $0.19
Ex-dividend
AVLV Sep 8, 2026
OAKM Dec 10, 2025
Paid on
AVLV Sep 10, 2026
OAKM Dec 11, 2025
Frequency
AVLV Quarterly
OAKM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

AVLVQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll AVLV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 16, 2021 $0.16; Mar 22, 2022 $0.22; Jun 21, 2022 $0.22; Sep 20, 2022 $0.26; Dec 15, 2022 $0.30; Mar 23, 2023 $0.28; Jun 20, 2023 $0.25; Sep 21, 2023 $0.23; Dec 18, 2023 $0.30; Mar 21, 2024 $0.22; Jun 24, 2024 $0.26; Sep 23, 2024 $0.27; Dec 17, 2024 $0.30; Mar 25, 2025 $0.27; Jun 24, 2025 $0.28; Sep 23, 2025 $0.18; Dec 16, 2025 $0.28; Mar 10, 2026 $0.23; Jun 9, 2026 $0.28; Sep 8, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
OAKMAnnual · 2 paymentsAll OAKM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.01; Dec 10, 2025 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

AVLV vs OAKM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AVLV 12.9%OAKM 12.7%since Jan 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AVLV 1.45OAKM 1.00since Jan 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AVLV −19.5%OAKM −15.2%since Dec 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AVLV 0.88OAKM 0.38

AVLV and OAKM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AVLVAvsSEIVA

    Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OAKMCvsSEIVA

    Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AVLVAvsWTVA

    Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OAKMCvsWTVA

    Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AVLVAvsDFLVA

    Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OAKMCvsDFLVA

    Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.