Skip to content
etf.net

OAKM vs WTV

Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF

OAKMCNYSE Arca

WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

WTVANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

WTV −0.47pt a year

OAKM0.59%WTV0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

OAKM 1.5×the volume

OAKM255KWTV167K

OAKM vs WTV Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+18.8%OAKM+21.6%WTV

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. OAKM +18.8%. WTV +21.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%15%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
OAKM 0.59%
WTV 0.12%, better
Fund size
OAKM $1.2B
WTV $3.33B
1Y total return
OAKM +18.8%
WTV +21.6%, better
Yield (12M)
OAKM 0.60%
WTV 1.99%, better
Holdings
OAKM 40
WTV 126
Avg volume (30D)
OAKM 255K sh, better
WTV 167K sh
NAV per share
OAKM $31.22
WTV $106.90
52W range

ETF.net Grade

OAKM: Cost 32, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 54, Durability 60. WTV: Cost 100, Risk 52, Mission not scored, Tradability 89, Holdings 84, Durability 90.
Pillar letters and Scores for OAKM, WTV, with each pillar’s weight
PillarOAKMWTV
Cost30% weightD32A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37C52Higher
Tradability15% weightA72A89Higher
Holdings10% weightC54A84Higher
Durability5% weightB60A90Higher

Rank among US Active Value funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. OAKM and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds
See all 64 ›

WTV ranks 2nd and OAKM 36th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 2AWTVWisdomTree U.S. Value FundScore 85
  4. Rank 4ADFLVDimensional US Large Cap Value ETFScore 83
  5. Rank 36CJDVLJohn Hancock Discipline Value Select ETFScore 46
  6. Rank 36COAKMOakmark U.S. Large Cap ETFScore 46
  7. Rank 38BLVDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

OAKMCOakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF

WTVAWisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

In short

OAKM Oakmark's value playbook, ETF-wrapped since 2024: an active manager hunting cheap US large caps, with the Russell 1000 Value as a yardstick rather than a blueprint. Active-manager pricing comes with it.

WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.

Stated mandate

OAKM The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.

Why people hold it

  • OAKM Genuinely active: picks run on Oakmark's own value philosophy, aiming at long-term capital appreciation, with the Russell 1000 Value as the measuring stick, not the shopping list.
  • No black box: the value screen is named and advertised in the fund's own filings, so you know which process you are hiring.
  • Easy to deal in for a young active fund: it changes hands regularly and ranks near the top of its large-cap value cohort on the cost of getting in and out.
  • One job, plainly stated: US large-cap equity with a value tilt, seeking long-term capital appreciation. Nothing exotic bolted on.
  • WTV Charges 0.12% a year, under a quarter of the 0.55% typical for active US value funds, and less than every same-benchmark rival in its group (JAVA 0.44%, CGVV 0.33%, TEQI 0.54%).
  • "Value" here means cash returned: dividend yield plus net buyback yield, with quality and profitability screens, rather than a plain low price-to-book sort.wisdomtree.com
  • About 160 US stocks, a multi-billion-dollar asset base, and a live track record dating to 2007. Distributions land quarterly.

Worth knowing

  • OAKM At 0.59% a year it costs more than the typical fund in its value cohort, and rules-based rivals like WTV (0.12%) and AVLV (0.15%) charge a fraction of that.
  • Launched in December 2024, so the live record is short and there is limited history behind the risk picture.
  • It currently sits in the lower half of its large-cap value peer group, where cheaper systematic funds hold the top spots.
  • WTV Full equity with no downside cushion, and a value tilt that can lean into a handful of sectors. Risk is the least polished part of the profile.
  • Rules-based active, not an index tracker, so results can diverge from the Russell 1000 Value in either direction.
  • Buybacks supply much of the shareholder yield, and companies can scale repurchases back more easily than they cut dividends.wisdomtree.com

Full OAKM profile⁠

Full WTV profile⁠

OAKM vs WTV Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

OAKM vs WTV Cost

Overpaying OAKM vs WTV

$9,115

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • OAKM 0.59%

    $11,635

  • WTV 0.12%

    $2,520

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • OAKM 0.59%
  • WTV 0.12%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530OAKM $11,635WTV $2,520

Year by year

YearOAKMWTVOverpaying
10$1,058$220$838
20$4,051$859$3,192
30$11,635$2,520$9,115

Expense ratio

  • 0.59%OAKM
  • 0.12%WTV, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Value funds
  • Median 0.55%

WTV cheapest of 64 funds

OAKM 42nd cheapest of 64 funds

OAKM vs WTV Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
OAKM 0.60%
WTV 1.99%, better
Payout (12M)
OAKM $0.19
WTV $2.14
Last payment
OAKM $0.19
WTV $0.55
Ex-dividend
OAKM Dec 10, 2025
WTV Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
OAKM Dec 11, 2025
WTV Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
OAKM Annual
WTV Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

OAKMAnnual · 2 paymentsAll OAKM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2024 $0.01; Dec 10, 2025 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
WTVQuarterly · 43 paymentsAll WTV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 43 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 27, 2017 $0.11; Jun 26, 2017 $0.15; Sep 26, 2017 $0.15; Dec 26, 2017 $0.17; Mar 20, 2018 $0.11; Jun 25, 2018 $0.16; Sep 25, 2018 $0.24; Dec 24, 2018 $0.22; Mar 26, 2019 $0.12; Jun 24, 2019 $0.15; Sep 24, 2019 $0.21; Dec 23, 2019 $0.20; Mar 24, 2020 $0.15; Jun 23, 2020 $0.19; Sep 22, 2020 $0.16; Dec 21, 2020 $0.27; Dec 30, 2020 $0.04; Mar 25, 2021 $0.22; Jun 24, 2021 $0.24; Sep 24, 2021 $0.25; Dec 27, 2021 $0.27; Mar 25, 2022 $0.23; Jun 24, 2022 $0.33; Sep 26, 2022 $0.32; Dec 23, 2022 $0.32; Mar 27, 2023 $0.20; Jun 26, 2023 $0.29; Sep 25, 2023 $0.26; Dec 22, 2023 $0.35; Dec 28, 2023 $0.02; Mar 22, 2024 $0.28; Jun 25, 2024 $0.32; Sep 25, 2024 $0.36; Dec 26, 2024 $0.33; Dec 31, 2024 $0.01; Mar 26, 2025 $0.32; Jun 25, 2025 $0.31; Sep 25, 2025 $0.38; Dec 26, 2025 $0.46; Dec 31, 2025 $0.02; Mar 26, 2026 $0.52; Jun 25, 2026 $0.59; Sep 25, 2026 $0.55. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

OAKM vs WTV Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
OAKM 12.7%since Jan 2025WTV 13.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
OAKM 1.00since Jan 2025WTV 1.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
OAKM −15.2%since Dec 2024WTV −19.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
OAKM 0.38WTV 0.94

OAKM and WTV in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • OAKMCvsAVLVA

    Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WTVAvsAVLVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • OAKMCvsSEIVA

    Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WTVAvsSEIVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • OAKMCvsDFLVA

    Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • WTVAvsDFLVA

    WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.