Skip to content

AVLV vs QVAL

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

AVLVANYSE Arca

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVALANasdaq

Overlap

11.4%by weight

Expense ratio

AVLV −0.13pt a year

AVLV0.15%QVAL0.28%

Avg volume · 30D

AVLV 37.8×the volume

AVLV1.62MQVAL42.8K

5Y return · a year

QVAL +0.4pt

AVLV+13.7%QVAL+14.1%

AVLV vs QVAL Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+90.3%AVLV+93.0%QVAL

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. AVLV +90.3%. QVAL +93.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%60%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AVLV 0.15%, better
QVAL 0.28%
Fund size
AVLV $22.6B
QVAL $721M
1Y total return
AVLV +30.9%
QVAL +42.2%, better
Yield (12M)
AVLV 1.09%
QVAL 1.36%, better
Holdings
AVLV 300
QVAL 52
Avg volume (30D)
AVLV 1.62M sh, better
QVAL 42.8K sh
NAV per share
AVLV $94.04
QVAL $64.59
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AVLV: Cost 98, Risk 60, Mission 87, Tradability 99, Holdings 75, Durability 85. QVAL: Cost 85, Risk 58, Mission 53, Tradability 85, Holdings 68, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for AVLV, QVAL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAVLVQVAL
Cost30% weightA98HigherA85
Mission25% weightA87HigherC53
Risk15% weightB60HigherB58
Tradability15% weightA99HigherA85
Holdings10% weightA75HigherB68
Durability5% weightA85HigherA84

Rank among US Active Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AVLV and QVAL are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Value⁠

Category · 64 funds
See all 64 ›

AVLV ranks 1st and QVAL 7th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLVAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETFScore 86
  2. Rank 2ASEIVSEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETFScore 85
  3. Rank 7AAVUVAvantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 7AQVALAlpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETFScore 77
  5. Rank 9BAIVLWisdomTree U.S. AI Enhanced Value FundScore 70

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AVLVAAvantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF

QVALAAlpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

In short

AVLV No data

QVAL Deep value with no hedging: about 50 US stocks chosen by a rules-based quality-and-value screen, run by a boutique quant shop since 2014, at roughly half the fee of the typical active value fund.

Stated mandate

AVLV No data

QVAL The fund aims to grow investors' capital over the long term.

Why people hold it

AVLV No data

  • QVAL 0.28% a year against a 0.55% median for active US value funds. Cheap for a specialist quant strategy.
  • About 50 names, screened on cheapness and quality together. A real bet, not a closet index in value clothing.
  • Live since 2014, so the record spans value's long drought and its recoveries rather than a backtest.
  • Top quartile of its US value peer group in our review, and it undercuts ITAN, the other fund drawn from the same Solactive US 1000 universe, on fee.

Worth knowing

AVLV No data

  • QVAL Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads can widen and limit orders matter more than with a mega-fund.
  • Concentration cuts both ways. Roughly 50 deep-value names can drift far from the broad market, in either direction, for long stretches.
  • The stated goal is long-term capital growth, with distributions paid quarterly rather than monthly.

Full AVLV profile⁠

Full QVAL profile⁠

AVLV vs QVAL Holdings

How AVLV and QVAL differ

Overlap by weight

11.4%

Shared holdings make up 57.8% of QVAL and 11.4% of AVLV.

Level by level

  • Holdings29 in both11.4%
  • Sector10 Sectors62.8%
  • Countryby domicile98.7%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in AVLV and QVAL, widest gap first
SectorMore in AVLVMore in QVAL
FinancialsAVLV +22.7 points
EnergyQVAL +11.6 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQVAL +9.1 points
Health CareQVAL +9.0 points
TechnologyAVLV +5.8 points
MaterialsQVAL +5.7 points
IndustrialsAVLV +5.2 points
CommunicationAVLV +3.4 points
UtilitiesQVAL +1.7 points
Consumer StaplesQVAL +0.2 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AVLV and QVAL, widest gap first
CountryMore in AVLVMore in QVAL
United StatesQVAL +1.3 points
SwitzerlandAVLV +0.7 points
Other countries (3)AVLV +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AVLV26.6%
  • QVAL23.7%

Securities held

  • AVLV299
  • QVAL51

Asset class

AVLV
Equity
QVAL
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in AVLV270
  • In both29
  • Only in QVAL22

Only in AVLV

270 securities, 88.6% of AVLV by weight

  • Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.000006253.39%
  • Meta Platforms Inc Class A Common Stock USD.0000062.87%
  • Apple Inc Common Stock USD.000012.81%

Only in QVAL

22 securities, 42.2% of QVAL by weight

  • ADT Inc2.90%
  • Accenture PLC2.65%
  • United Therapeutics Corp2.25%

Weight gaps

All 29 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in AVLV and QVAL, widest gap first
HoldingMore in AVLVMore in QVAL
Range Resources Corp Common Stock USD.01RRCQVAL +2.43 points
Abercrombie & Fitch Co Class A Common Stock USD.01ANFQVAL +2.18 points
Constellation Brands Inc A Common Stock USD.01STZQVAL +2.12 points
Urban Outfitters Inc Common Stock USD.0001URBNQVAL +2.10 points
Pultegroup Inc Common Stock USD.01PHMQVAL +1.88 points
Apa Corp Common Stock USD.625APAQVAL +1.85 points
Macy’s Inc Common Stock USD.01MQVAL +1.85 points
Expand Energy Corp Common Stock USD.01EXEQVAL +1.75 points

All 303 AVLV holdings⁠All 50 QVAL holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AVLV vs QVAL Cost

Overpaying QVAL vs AVLV

$2,618

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AVLV 0.15%

    $3,137

  • QVAL 0.28%

    $5,755

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AVLV 0.15%
  • QVAL 0.28%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530QVAL $5,755AVLV $3,137

Year by year

YearAVLVQVALOverpaying
10$274$509$235
20$1,071$1,976$905
30$3,137$5,755$2,618

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%AVLV, cheaper
  • 0.28%QVAL
  • Middle half of US Active Value funds
  • Median 0.55%

AVLV 2nd cheapest of 64 funds

QVAL 9th cheapest of 64 funds

AVLV vs QVAL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
AVLV 1.09%
QVAL 1.36%, better
Payout (12M)
AVLV $1.03
QVAL $0.88
Last payment
AVLV $0.23
QVAL $0.24
Ex-dividend
AVLV Sep 8, 2026
QVAL Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
AVLV Sep 10, 2026
QVAL Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
AVLV Quarterly
QVAL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AVLVQuarterly · 20 paymentsAll AVLV payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 16, 2021 $0.16; Mar 22, 2022 $0.22; Jun 21, 2022 $0.22; Sep 20, 2022 $0.26; Dec 15, 2022 $0.30; Mar 23, 2023 $0.28; Jun 20, 2023 $0.25; Sep 21, 2023 $0.23; Dec 18, 2023 $0.30; Mar 21, 2024 $0.22; Jun 24, 2024 $0.26; Sep 23, 2024 $0.27; Dec 17, 2024 $0.30; Mar 25, 2025 $0.27; Jun 24, 2025 $0.28; Sep 23, 2025 $0.18; Dec 16, 2025 $0.28; Mar 10, 2026 $0.23; Jun 9, 2026 $0.28; Sep 8, 2026 $0.23. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
QVALQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll QVAL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.07; Jun 19, 2017 $0.08; Sep 18, 2017 $0.07; Dec 27, 2017 $0.11; Mar 19, 2018 $0.05; Jun 18, 2018 $0.10; Sep 17, 2018 $0.08; Dec 27, 2018 $0.18; Mar 18, 2019 $0.09; Jun 17, 2019 $0.15; Sep 16, 2019 $0.13; Dec 30, 2019 $0.25; Mar 16, 2020 $0.07; Jun 15, 2020 $0.13; Sep 14, 2020 $0.06; Dec 30, 2020 $0.27; Mar 15, 2021 $0.10; Jun 14, 2021 $0.04; Sep 13, 2021 $0.04; Dec 30, 2021 $0.28; Mar 14, 2022 $0.06; Jun 13, 2022 $0.20; Sep 12, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.29; Mar 29, 2023 $0.18; Jun 28, 2023 $0.20; Sep 27, 2023 $0.14; Dec 20, 2023 $0.19; Mar 13, 2024 $0.14; Jun 20, 2024 $0.27; Sep 12, 2024 $0.15; Dec 24, 2024 $0.21; Mar 13, 2025 $0.10; Jun 13, 2025 $0.17; Sep 12, 2025 $0.19; Dec 23, 2025 $0.24; Mar 30, 2026 $0.21; Jun 29, 2026 $0.19; Sep 28, 2026 $0.24. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

AVLV vs QVAL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • AVLV
  • QVAL
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: QVAL −27.1% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AVLV 12.9%, betterQVAL 14.9%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AVLV 1.45, betterQVAL 1.25
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AVLV −19.5%, betterQVAL −27.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AVLV 0.88QVAL 0.69

AVLV and QVAL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AVLVAvsSEIVA

    Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QVALAvsSEIVA

    Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF · SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AVLVAvsWTVA

    Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QVALAvsWTVA

    Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF · WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AVLVAvsDFLVA

    Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QVALAvsDFLVA

    Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF · Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.28% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.