WTV ranks 2nd and QVAL 7th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
QVAL vs WTV
WTV −0.16pt a year
0.28%0.12%
WTV 3.9×the volume
42.8K167K
WTV +2.2pt
+13.1%+15.3%
QVAL vs WTV Performance
+93.0%+88.7%
- QVAL 0.28%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- QVAL $721M
- WTV $3.33B
- QVAL +42.2%, better
- WTV +21.6%
- QVAL 1.36%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- QVAL 52
- WTV 126
- QVAL 42.8K sh
- WTV 167K sh, better
- QVAL $64.59
- WTV $106.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QVAL | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85 | A100Higher |
| Mission | C53 | |
| Risk | B58Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | A85 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A84 | A90Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. QVAL and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QVALA
WTVA
In short
QVAL Deep value with no hedging: about 50 US stocks chosen by a rules-based quality-and-value screen, run by a boutique quant shop since 2014, at roughly half the fee of the typical active value fund.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
QVAL The fund aims to grow investors' capital over the long term.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QVAL vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QVAL vs WTV Cost
Overpaying QVAL vs WTV
$3,235
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QVAL 0.28%
$5,755
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QVAL | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $220 | $289 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $859 | $1,117 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $2,520 | $3,235 |
- 0.28%QVAL
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
QVAL 9th cheapest of 64 funds
QVAL vs WTV Dividends
- QVAL 1.36%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- QVAL $0.88
- WTV $2.14
- QVAL $0.24
- WTV $0.55
- QVAL Sep 28, 2026
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- QVAL Sep 30, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- QVAL Quarterly
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
QVAL vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QVAL
- WTV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QVAL 14.9%WTV 13.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QVAL 1.25WTV 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- QVAL −27.1%WTV −19.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QVAL 0.69WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.