AVTM ranks 1st and BCGS 38th of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.
AVTM vs BCGS
AVTM −0.58pt a year
0.22%0.80%
AVTM 3.8×the volume
3.19K830
AVTM vs BCGS Performance
0.0%−9.9%
- AVTM 0.22%, better
- BCGS 0.80%
- AVTM $766M
- BCGS $38M
- AVTM 1712
- BCGS 51
- AVTM 3.19K sh, better
- BCGS 830 sh
- AVTM $53.87
- BCGS $25.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVTM | BCGS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | D30 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B58Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | F14 |
| Holdings | A71 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | C40 |
Rank among Global Active Equity funds
Same Category. AVTM and BCGS are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVTMA
BCGSD
In short
AVTM Avantis' one-ticket world stock market: roughly 1,700 holdings, U.S. names owned directly and the overseas sleeves held through sister Avantis funds, all tilted toward cheaper, more profitable companies.
BCGS A new active global fund built around one idea: own listed large companies, US and overseas, that generate strong free cash flow and can compound it. Bancreek is a boutique shop, and this is its stock-picking case in global equities.
Stated mandate
AVTM Seeks long-term capital appreciation through a broadly diversified total-market equity allocation, using individual securities and Avantis ETFs while emphasizing securities expected to offer higher returns or better risk characteristics than a passive market-capitalization-weighted index.
BCGS The Fund seeks long-term capital growth. It is an actively managed ETF investing primarily in equity securities, generally focusing on listed large-capitalization companies tied economically to both U.S. and non-U.S. markets and selected for their potential to compound capital and generate strong free cash flow.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVTM vs BCGS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVTM vs BCGS Cost
Overpaying BCGS vs AVTM
$10,788
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVTM 0.22%
$4,558
BCGS 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVTM | BCGS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $1,422 | $1,021 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $5,393 | $3,832 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $15,346 | $10,788 |
- 0.22%AVTM, cheaper
- 0.80%BCGS
- Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
- Median 0.69%
AVTM cheapest of 44 funds
BCGS 31st cheapest of 44 funds
AVTM vs BCGS Dividends
- AVTM $0.15
- BCGS $0.009
- AVTM Sep 8, 2026
- BCGS Sep 28, 2026
- AVTM Sep 10, 2026
- BCGS Sep 30, 2026
- AVTM Quarterly
- BCGS Quarterly
Distribution history
AVTM vs BCGS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- AVTM 0.95BCGS 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.