BDVL ranks 1st and BCGS 38th of 44 funds in the Global Active Equity Category.
BCGS vs BDVL
BDVL −0.41pt a year
0.80%0.39%
BDVL 284.8×the volume
830236K
BCGS vs BDVL Performance
−9.9%+1.0%
- BCGS 0.80%
- BDVL 0.39%, better
- BCGS $37M
- BDVL $1.77B
- BCGS
- BDVL +9.7%
- BCGS 51
- BDVL 423
- BCGS 830 sh
- BDVL 236K sh, better
- BCGS $24.68
- BDVL $26.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BCGS | BDVL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | A79Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F19 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | F13 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | A80 | A89Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A93Higher |
Rank among Global Active Equity funds
Same Category. BCGS and BDVL are both graded against the same 44 Global Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BCGSD
BDVLA
In short
BCGS A new active global fund built around one idea: own listed large companies, US and overseas, that generate strong free cash flow and can compound it. Bancreek is a boutique shop, and this is its stock-picking case in global equities.
BDVL A global low-volatility fund with an active engine: a quant model picks roughly 500 stocks on low vol, quality and value, scored against MSCI's ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Fee: 0.39% net of a waiver through June 30, 2028.
Stated mandate
BCGS The Fund seeks long-term capital growth. It is an actively managed ETF investing primarily in equity securities, generally focusing on listed large-capitalization companies tied economically to both U.S. and non-U.S. markets and selected for their potential to compound capital and generate strong free cash flow.
BDVL The Fund seeks risk-adjusted total return through active management of equity exposure, with a focus on managing volatility relative to the broad equity market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BCGS vs BDVL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BCGS vs BDVL Cost
Overpaying BCGS vs BDVL
$7,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BCGS 0.80%
$15,346
BDVL 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BCGS | BDVL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,422 | $705 | $717 |
| 20 | $5,393 | $2,725 | $2,668 |
| 30 | $15,346 | $7,898 | $7,448 |
- 0.80%BCGS
- 0.39%BDVL, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Active Equity funds
- Median 0.69%
BDVL 9th cheapest of 44 funds
BCGS 31st cheapest of 44 funds
BCGS vs BDVL Dividends
- BCGS $0.009
- BDVL $0.22
- BCGS Sep 28, 2026
- BDVL Jun 15, 2026
- BCGS Sep 30, 2026
- BDVL Jun 18, 2026
- BCGS Quarterly
- BDVL Twice a year
Distribution history
BCGS vs BDVL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BCGS BDVL 8.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BCGS BDVL 0.60
- Worst fall
- BCGS BDVL −7.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BCGS 0.90BDVL 0.61
Popular comparisons
- 0.80% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.