BABU ranks 82nd and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BABU vs GOGL
0.0%by weight
GOGL −0.77pt a year
0.97%0.20%
BABU 8.2×the volume
155K18.9K
BABU vs GOGL Performance
−39.7%−41.9%
- BABU 0.97%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- BABU $6M
- GOGL $4M
- BABU 9
- GOGL 1
- BABU 155K sh, better
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- BABU $7.34
- GOGL $15.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BABU | GOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A93 | |
| Risk | C47 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C47Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59Higher | D37 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BABU and GOGL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BABUC
GOGLC
In short
BABU Three ETFs chase 200% of Alibaba's daily move. This one charges the least of them: 0.97% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027. A trading tool, built for days, not years.
Stated mandate
BABU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Alibaba Group Holding Limited common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BABU vs GOGL Holdings
How BABU and GOGL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BABU and 0.0% of GOGL.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BABU and GOGL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- BABU100.0%
- GOGL199.4%
- BABU3
- GOGL0
Asset class
- BABU
- Equity
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in BABU3
- In both0
- Only in GOGL0
Only in BABU
3 securities, 36.1% of BABU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50628.59%
- Alibaba Group Holding-Sp Adr5.52%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut1.98%
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Weight gaps
BABU and GOGL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BABU vs GOGL Cost
Overpaying BABU vs GOGL
$14,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BABU 0.97%
$18,198
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BABU | GOGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $365 | $1,347 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $1,421 | $5,022 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $4,155 | $14,043 |
- 0.97%BABU
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
BABU 156th cheapest of 315 funds
BABU vs GOGL Dividends
- BABU
- GOGL None
- BABU $0.05
- GOGL
- BABU Sep 22, 2026
- GOGL
- BABU Sep 29, 2026
- GOGL
- BABU Quarterly
- GOGL
Distribution history
BABU vs GOGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- BABU 1.51GOGL −3.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.