PANG ranks 3rd and BABU 82nd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BABU vs PANG
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.21pt a year
0.97%0.76%
BABU 3.5×the volume
155K44.6K
BABU vs PANG Performance
−39.7%+7.0%
- BABU 0.97%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- BABU $6M
- PANG $9M
- BABU
- PANG +91.6%
- BABU 9
- PANG 4
- BABU 155K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- BABU $7.34
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BABU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A94Higher |
| Risk | C47 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BABU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BABUC
PANGA
In short
BABU Three ETFs chase 200% of Alibaba's daily move. This one charges the least of them: 0.97% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027. A trading tool, built for days, not years.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
BABU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Alibaba Group Holding Limited common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BABU vs PANG Holdings
How BABU and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BABU and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Country0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BABU and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BABUMore in PANG | BABU | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | BABU +100.0 points | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| United States | PANG +100.0 points | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Outside the US: BABU 0% developed, 100% emerging.
Concentration
- BABU100.0%
- PANG208.4%
- BABU3
- PANG1
Asset class
- BABU
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BABU3
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in BABU
3 securities, 36.1% of BABU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50628.59%
- Alibaba Group Holding-Sp Adr5.52%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut1.98%
Only in PANG
1 security, 8.4% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.43%
Weight gaps
BABU and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BABU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying BABU vs PANG
$3,542
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BABU 0.97%
$18,198
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BABU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,353 | $359 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,142 | $1,301 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $14,656 | $3,542 |
- 0.97%BABU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BABU 156th cheapest of 315 funds
BABU vs PANG Dividends
- BABU $0.05
- PANG $1.30
- BABU Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- BABU Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- BABU Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
BABU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BABU PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BABU PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BABU PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BABU 1.51PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.