PANG ranks 3rd and BAIG 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BAIG vs PANG
5.5%by weight
PANG −0.02pt a year
0.78%0.76%
PANG 1.7×the volume
25.8K44.6K
BAIG vs PANG Performance
−94.2%+91.6%
- BAIG 0.78%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- BAIG $5M
- PANG $9M
- BAIG −94.2%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- BAIG 5
- PANG 4
- BAIG 25.8K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- BAIG $10.49
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAIG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A90 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D25 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | C52 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BAIG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAIGC
PANGA
In short
BAIG Most 2x single-stock ETFs point at megacaps. BAIG points at BigBear.ai, a small, jumpy defense-AI name, and aims for twice its daily move through swaps, reset every day, for 0.78% a year with no waiver.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
BAIG The Fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in BBAI's common-stock price, before fees and expenses. It does not pursue this objective for periods different from one trading day.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAIG vs PANG Holdings
How BAIG and PANG differ
5.5%
Shared holdings make up 8.4% of PANG and 5.5% of BAIG.
Level by level
- Holdings5.5%
Sector
No Sector split for BAIG and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BAIGMore in PANG | BAIG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BAIG205.5%
- PANG208.4%
- BAIG1
- PANG1
Asset class
- BAIG
- Equity
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BAIG0
- In both1
- Only in PANG0
Only in BAIG
0 securities, 0.0% of BAIG by weight
Only in PANG
0 securities, 0.0% of PANG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in BAIGMore in PANG | BAIG | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | PANG +2.93 points | 5.50% | 8.43% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAIG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying BAIG vs PANG
$346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAIG 0.78%
$15,002
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAIG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,388 | $1,353 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,268 | $5,142 | $126 |
| 30 | $15,002 | $14,656 | $346 |
- 0.78%BAIG
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BAIG 142nd cheapest of 315 funds
BAIG vs PANG Dividends
- BAIG $4.75
- PANG $1.30
- BAIG Dec 30, 2025
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- BAIG Jan 2, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- BAIG Irregular
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
BAIG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAIG 119.2%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAIG −1.05PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BAIG −97.7%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BAIG 6.83PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.78% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.78% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.