Skip to content

BAMU vs ICSH

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF

BAMUDCboe

iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

ICSHACboe

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

ICSH −0.92pt a year

BAMU1.00%ICSH0.08%

Avg volume · 30D

ICSH 199.8×the volume

BAMU8.37KICSH1.67M

3Y return · a year

ICSH +1.5pt

BAMU+3.4%ICSH+4.9%

BAMU vs ICSH Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+2.8%BAMU+3.7%ICSH

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. BAMU +2.8%. ICSH +3.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BAMU 1.00%
ICSH 0.08%, better
Fund size
BAMU $66M
ICSH $8.91B
1Y total return
BAMU +2.8%
ICSH +3.7%, better
Yield (12M)
BAMU 2.90%
ICSH 4.12%, better
Holdings
BAMU 7
ICSH 401
Avg volume (30D)
BAMU 8.37K sh
ICSH 1.67M sh, better
NAV per share
BAMU $25.30
ICSH $50.32
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BAMU: Cost 0, Risk 33, Mission 99, Tradability 21, Holdings 28, Durability 41. ICSH: Cost 89, Risk 53, Mission 100, Tradability 76, Holdings 96, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for BAMU, ICSH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBAMUICSH
Cost30% weightF0A89Higher
Mission25% weightA99A100Higher
Risk15% weightD33C53Higher
Tradability15% weightF21A76Higher
Holdings10% weightD28A96Higher
Durability5% weightC41A91Higher

Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BAMU and ICSH are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Cash & Ultra-Short Income⁠

Category · 78 funds
See all 78 ›

ICSH ranks 1st and BAMU 70th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.

  1. Rank 1AICSHiShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2ACLIPGlobal X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETFScore 82
  3. Rank 69FLQIDKurv Enhanced Short Maturity ETFScore 39
  4. Rank 70DBAMUBrookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETFScore 37
  5. Rank 70DFUSDFederated Hermes Ultrashort Bond ETFScore 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BAMUDBrookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF

ICSHAiShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF

In short

BAMU Most of the T-bill aisle just holds bills and charges next to nothing. BAMU goes the other way: an active manager steering maturities inside a 0 to 2 year band off its own read on the yield curve, for 1.00% a year.

ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.

Stated mandate

BAMU The Fund seeks current income. It is actively managed and invests at least 80% of assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment-grade corporate bonds with maturities from 0 to 2 years, plus related fixed-income ETFs; it does not seek to replicate an index.

ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.

Why people hold it

  • BAMU Does what the prospectus says: at least 80% in U.S. Treasuries and investment-grade corporates maturing inside two years. Portfolio and mandate line up closely.sec.gov
  • The adviser dials duration to its near-term rate outlook and the shape of the yield curve, a lever the index bill funds in this category do not have.sec.gov
  • Not just bills: an investment-grade corporate sleeve and fixed-income ETFs can add income potential beyond Treasuries alone. Income is paid quarterly.sec.gov
  • ICSH At 0.08% a year it undercuts the typical cash-alternative ETF, which charges about 0.20%, and comes in below top-rated rivals like FLUD and JPST.
  • Actively managed rather than a fixed ladder: the team picks across ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, spread over roughly 250 positions.ishares.com
  • Trading since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that changes hands actively, giving it one of the longer records in the cash-alternative aisle.
  • Sits in the top quartile of its cash-alternative peer group, helped by high-quality holdings and low cost.

Worth knowing

  • BAMU The 1.00% fee is above the category median, and above ICSH at 0.08%, VUSB at 0.10% and VBIL at 0.06%. On a 0 to 2 year bond portfolio, fee eats a real slice of yield.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's household names, so spreads can be wider and limit orders matter more.
  • Credit and active risk ride along: corporates and ETF positions are not Treasuries, and the manager's curve calls can land either way.sec.gov
  • ICSH Not a money market fund. The share price floats, and preservation of capital is the stated aim, not a promise.ishares.com
  • It holds investment-grade corporate paper alongside money market instruments, so it carries credit risk a Treasury-bill-only fund does not.ishares.com
  • It pays monthly, but the amount rides short-term rates, and as an active fund its results can drift from its 6-month T-bill reference index either way.

Full BAMU profile⁠

Full ICSH profile⁠

BAMU vs ICSH Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAMU vs ICSH Cost

Overpaying BAMU vs ICSH

$16,999

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BAMU 1.00%

    $18,688

  • ICSH 0.08%

    $1,689

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BAMU 1.00%
  • ICSH 0.08%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BAMU $18,688ICSH $1,689

Year by year

YearBAMUICSHOverpaying
10$1,763$147$1,616
20$6,625$575$6,050
30$18,688$1,689$16,999

Expense ratio

  • 1.00%BAMU
  • 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
  • Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
  • Median 0.18%

ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds

BAMU 78th cheapest of 78 funds

BAMU vs ICSH Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
BAMU 2.90%
ICSH 4.12%, better
Payout (12M)
BAMU $0.73
ICSH $2.07
Last payment
BAMU $0.17
ICSH $0.18
Ex-dividend
BAMU Aug 28, 2026
ICSH Nov 2, 2026
Paid on
BAMU Sep 4, 2026
ICSH Nov 5, 2026
Frequency
BAMU Quarterly
ICSH Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BAMUQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll BAMU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Nov 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 26, 2023 $0.18; Feb 28, 2024 $0.08; May 31, 2024 $0.25; Aug 30, 2024 $0.27; Nov 29, 2024 $0.26; Dec 27, 2024 $0.15; Feb 28, 2025 $0.07; May 28, 2025 $0.19; Aug 29, 2025 $0.21; Nov 28, 2025 $0.19; Dec 26, 2025 $0.15; Feb 27, 2026 $0.06; May 28, 2026 $0.17; Aug 28, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD
ICSHMonthly · 46 paymentsAll ICSH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 46 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Feb 1, 2023 $0.20; Mar 1, 2023 $0.16; Apr 3, 2023 $0.18; May 1, 2023 $0.18; Jun 1, 2023 $0.19; Jul 3, 2023 $0.20; Aug 1, 2023 $0.22; Sep 1, 2023 $0.22; Oct 2, 2023 $0.20; Nov 1, 2023 $0.23; Dec 1, 2023 $0.22; Dec 14, 2023 $0.22; Feb 1, 2024 $0.23; Mar 1, 2024 $0.22; Apr 1, 2024 $0.23; May 1, 2024 $0.22; Jun 3, 2024 $0.23; Jul 1, 2024 $0.22; Aug 1, 2024 $0.22; Sep 3, 2024 $0.22; Oct 1, 2024 $0.22; Nov 1, 2024 $0.21; Dec 2, 2024 $0.21; Dec 18, 2024 $0.21; Feb 3, 2025 $0.20; Mar 3, 2025 $0.18; Apr 1, 2025 $0.20; May 1, 2025 $0.19; Jun 2, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.20; Aug 1, 2025 $0.21; Sep 2, 2025 $0.19; Oct 1, 2025 $0.19; Nov 3, 2025 $0.19; Dec 1, 2025 $0.18; Dec 19, 2025 $0.19; Feb 2, 2026 $0.17; Mar 2, 2026 $0.16; Apr 1, 2026 $0.17; May 1, 2026 $0.17; Jun 1, 2026 $0.17; Jul 1, 2026 $0.17; Aug 3, 2026 $0.17; Sep 1, 2026 $0.17; Oct 1, 2026 $0.17; Nov 2, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2520232026YTD

BAMU vs ICSH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BAMU 0.3%, betterICSH 0.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BAMU −5.11ICSH 0.87, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BAMU −0.4%since Sep 2023ICSH −0.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BAMU −0.02ICSH 0.04

Popular comparisons

  • BAMUDvsCLIPA

    Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF · Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICSHAvsSGOVA

    iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF · iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.09%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMUDvsVBILA

    Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF · Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICSHAvsJPSTA

    iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF · JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAMUDvsVUSBA

    Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF · Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ICSHAvsVUSBA

    iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF · Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.08% · 0.10%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.