DFLV ranks 4th and BAMV 48th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
BAMV vs DFLV
DFLV −0.65pt a year
0.86%0.21%
DFLV 33.0×the volume
19.7K650K
DFLV +6.6pt
+15.6%+22.2%
BAMV vs DFLV Performance
+16.3%+29.1%
- BAMV 0.86%
- DFLV 0.21%, better
- BAMV $123M
- DFLV $7.26B
- BAMV +16.3%
- DFLV +29.1%, better
- BAMV 1.23%
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- BAMV 101
- DFLV 336
- BAMV 19.7K sh
- DFLV 650K sh, better
- BAMV $35.91
- DFLV $40.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMV | DFLV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F9 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A78Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A83Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. BAMV and DFLV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMVD
DFLVA
In short
BAMV A stock-picker's value fund in a category run by quant screens. Brookstone's team hand-builds roughly 80 US names, $2 billion market cap and up, and charges 0.86% with no fee waiver in place.
DFLV Dimensional's value playbook in an ETF wrapper: large-cap value that also screens for profitability, spread across roughly 300 names, run by research rather than an index. Active by design, index-fund cheap in practice.
Stated mandate
BAMV The Fund's stated objective is capital appreciation.
DFLV The ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Its investment approach combines research, portfolio design, portfolio management, and trading, emphasizing long-term expected-return drivers and broad diversification.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMV vs DFLV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMV vs DFLV Cost
Overpaying BAMV vs DFLV
$12,011
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMV 0.86%
$16,368
DFLV 0.21%
$4,357
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMV | DFLV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $383 | $1,142 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $1,491 | $4,277 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $4,357 | $12,011 |
- 0.86%BAMV
- 0.21%DFLV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
DFLV 6th cheapest of 64 funds
BAMV 59th cheapest of 64 funds
BAMV vs DFLV Dividends
- BAMV 1.23%
- DFLV 1.35%, better
- BAMV $0.45
- DFLV $0.57
- BAMV $0.11
- DFLV $0.16
- BAMV Aug 28, 2026
- DFLV Sep 22, 2026
- BAMV Sep 4, 2026
- DFLV Sep 24, 2026
- BAMV Quarterly
- DFLV Quarterly
Distribution history
BAMV vs DFLV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMV 11.7%, betterDFLV 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMV 1.03DFLV 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- BAMV −14.5%DFLV −16.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMV 0.70DFLV 0.78
Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.