SEIV ranks 3rd and BAMV 48th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
BAMV vs SEIV
SEIV −0.71pt a year
0.86%0.15%
SEIV 7.2×the volume
19.7K142K
SEIV +11.6pt
+15.6%+27.2%
BAMV vs SEIV Performance
+16.3%+26.2%
- BAMV 0.86%
- SEIV 0.15%, better
- BAMV $123M
- SEIV $1.59B
- BAMV +16.3%
- SEIV +26.2%, better
- BAMV 1.23%
- SEIV 1.58%, better
- BAMV 101
- SEIV 123
- BAMV 19.7K sh
- SEIV 142K sh, better
- BAMV $35.91
- SEIV $48.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMV | SEIV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F9 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A84 | |
| Risk | B56 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A76Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. BAMV and SEIV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMVD
SEIVA
In short
BAMV A stock-picker's value fund in a category run by quant screens. Brookstone's team hand-builds roughly 80 US names, $2 billion market cap and up, and charges 0.86% with no fee waiver in place.
SEIV Active quant value stock-picking at an index-fund price. SEIV screens U.S. large caps for cheap valuations plus quality, momentum and low volatility, then runs a concentrated book of roughly 80 names for 0.15% a year.
Stated mandate
BAMV The Fund's stated objective is capital appreciation.
SEIV The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through primarily U.S. common stocks priced below fundamental valuation measures, using a quantitative, active stock-selection approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMV vs SEIV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMV vs SEIV Cost
Overpaying BAMV vs SEIV
$13,231
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMV 0.86%
$16,368
SEIV 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMV | SEIV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $274 | $1,251 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $1,071 | $4,697 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $3,137 | $13,231 |
- 0.86%BAMV
- 0.15%SEIV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
SEIV 2nd cheapest of 64 funds
BAMV 59th cheapest of 64 funds
BAMV vs SEIV Dividends
- BAMV 1.23%
- SEIV 1.58%, better
- BAMV $0.45
- SEIV $0.78
- BAMV $0.11
- SEIV $0.21
- BAMV Aug 28, 2026
- SEIV Oct 5, 2026
- BAMV Sep 4, 2026
- SEIV Oct 6, 2026
- BAMV Quarterly
- SEIV Quarterly
Distribution history
BAMV vs SEIV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMV 11.7%, betterSEIV 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMV 1.03SEIV 1.80, better
- Worst fall
- BAMV −14.5%SEIV −18.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMV 0.70SEIV 0.89
BAMV and SEIV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
