BBIB vs MLDR: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF

BBIBACboe

Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF

MLDRBNYSE Arca

Overlap

No data

Expense ratio

BBIB −0.08pt a year

BBIB0.04%MLDR0.12%

Avg volume · 30D

BBIB 18.8×the volume

BBIB5.31KMLDR282

BBIB vs MLDR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.4%BBIB−0.8%MLDR

Expense ratio: BBIB 0.04%, better; MLDR 0.12%
Fund size: BBIB $77M; MLDR $9M
1Y total return: BBIB −0.4%, better; MLDR −0.8%
Yield (12M): BBIB 4.03%, better; MLDR 3.95%
Holdings: BBIB 82; MLDR 69
Avg volume (30D): BBIB 5.31K sh, better; MLDR 282 sh
NAV per share: BBIB $95.69; MLDR $47.57
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for BBIB, MLDR, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	BBIB	MLDR
Cost30% weight	A92Higher	C50
Mission25% weight	A100	A100
Risk15% weight	B61Higher	C48
Tradability15% weight	F24Higher	F14
Holdings10% weight	A71Higher	B61
Durability5% weight	C43Higher	D26

Rank among Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. BBIB and MLDR are both graded against the same 19 Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Treasuries (3-10 Year)⁠

Category · 19 funds

See all 19 ›

BBIB ranks 4th and MLDR 10th of 19 funds in the Treasuries (3-10 Year) Category.

Rank 1ASPTIState Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETFScore 84
Rank 1AVGITVanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETFScore 84
Rank 3ASCHRSchwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETFScore 82
Rank 4ABBIBJPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETFScore 74
Rank 5AXTREBondBloxx Bloomberg Three Year Target Duration US Treasury ETFScore 72
Rank 9BIEFiShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETFScore 59
Rank 10BMLDRGlobal X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETFScore 56
Rank 11BUFIVUS Treasury 5 Year Note ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BBIBAJPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF

MLDRBGlobal X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF

In short

BBIB A plain ladder of 3-to-10-year Treasuries at four basis points. JPMorgan showed up late to this corner of the market and priced its way in, undercutting most of the intermediate Treasury shelf while hugging its index.

MLDR One ticker instead of a homemade bond ladder. MLDR follows an index that spreads US Treasuries across maturity rungs from 3 to 10 years and rolls them forward as they age. Pays monthly, costs 0.12% a year.

Stated mandate

BBIB The fund is designed to provide current income and to closely track the investment results of the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year benchmark.

MLDR The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the FTSE US Treasury 3-10 Years Laddered Bond Index.

Why people hold it

BBIB Charges 0.04% a year, well below the typical intermediate Treasury fund and only a hair off the cheapest names in the group (SPTI, SCHR).
Built to track the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year index and stays close to it, one of the tightest implementations in its peer group.jpmorgan.com
Straight government paper, roughly 80 issues, no credit sleeve, and income paid monthly.

MLDR At 0.12% a year, it undercuts the median intermediate Treasury fund in its group (0.15%).
The laddered index keeps maturities spread across the 3-to-10-year range, so bonds roll off and get reinvested on a rolling schedule rather than all at once.globalxetfs.com
US government paper only, no corporate credit, roughly 70 positions, and cash goes out monthly. What's on the tin is what's in the fund.globalxetfs.com

Worth knowing

BBIB Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so spreads can run wider and bigger orders take more care.
A 2023 launch with a modest asset base, so the record here is short compared with decade-old rivals.
Intermediate duration cuts both ways: prices move opposite yields, more than cash-like funds and less than long bonds.

MLDR Plain market-weighted rivals are cheaper: SPTI and SCHR both run 0.03%. The ladder construction is what the extra buys.
A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the category's giants. Order size and order type matter more here.
Launched in 2024, so there's not yet a long record to judge it across a full rate cycle.

Full BBIB profile⁠

Full MLDR profile⁠

BBIB vs MLDR Holdings

As of Oct 13, 2026

How BBIB and MLDR differ

No overlap figure

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.

Level by level

Asset classFixed Income100%
Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for BBIB and MLDR.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BBIB and MLDR, widest gap first
Country	More in BBIBMore in MLDR	BBIB	MLDR
United States	Same weight	100.0%	100.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

BBIB24.6%
MLDR37.3%

Securities held

BBIB81
MLDR68

Asset class

BBIB: Fixed Income
MLDR: Fixed Income

Holdings

Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. BBIB holds 81 securities, MLDR 68.

All 81 BBIB holdings⁠All 68 MLDR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BBIB vs MLDR Cost

Overpaying MLDR vs BBIB

$1,671

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

BBIB 0.04%
$849
MLDR 0.12%
$2,520

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

BBIB 0.04%
MLDR 0.12%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	BBIB	MLDR	Overpaying
10	$73	$220	$147
20	$288	$859	$571
30	$849	$2,520	$1,671

Expense ratio

0.04%BBIB, cheaper
0.12%MLDR

BBIB0.04%MLDR0.12%

0.03%0.39%

Middle half of Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds
Median 0.12%

BBIB 4th cheapest of 19 funds

MLDR 10th cheapest of 19 funds

BBIB vs MLDR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): BBIB 4.03%, better; MLDR 3.95%
Payout (12M): BBIB $3.86; MLDR $1.88
Last payment: BBIB $0.33; MLDR $0.16
Ex-dividend: BBIB Oct 1, 2026; MLDR Oct 1, 2026
Paid on: BBIB Oct 5, 2026; MLDR Oct 6, 2026
Frequency: BBIB Monthly; MLDR Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

BBIBMonthly · 42 paymentsAll BBIB payments⁠

MLDRMonthly · 25 paymentsAll MLDR payments⁠

BBIB vs MLDR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: BBIB 4.7%MLDR 4.4%since Oct 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: BBIB 0.01MLDR −0.61since Oct 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: BBIB −6.4%since Apr 2023MLDR −5.1%since Sep 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: BBIB 0.78MLDR 0.04; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

BBIBAvsSPTIA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF
Expense ratio
0.04% · 0.03%
Category
MLDRBvsSPTIA
Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Treasury ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.03%
Category
BBIBAvsVGITA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF · Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
Expense ratio
0.04% · 0.03%
Category
MLDRBvsVGITA
Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF · Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.03%
Category
BBIBAvsSCHRA
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF · Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Expense ratio
0.04% · 0.03%
Category
MLDRBvsSCHRA
Global X Intermediate-Term Treasury Ladder ETF · Schwab Intermediate-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Expense ratio
0.12% · 0.03%
Category