BBIB ranks 4th and TUA 16th of 19 funds in the Treasuries (3-10 Year) Category.
BBIB vs TUA
BBIB −0.35pt a year
0.04%0.39%
TUA 70.8×the volume
5.31K376K
BBIB +3.6pt
+4.5%+0.9%
BBIB vs TUA Performance
−0.4%−7.1%
- BBIB 0.04%, better
- TUA 0.39%
- BBIB $77M
- TUA $486M
- BBIB −0.4%, better
- TUA −7.1%
- BBIB 4.03%, better
- TUA 3.51%
- BBIB 82
- TUA 8
- BBIB 5.31K sh
- TUA 376K sh, better
- BBIB $95.69
- TUA $19.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBIB | TUA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | B61Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | F24 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | C41 |
| Durability | C43 | B61Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds
Same Category. BBIB and TUA are both graded against the same 19 Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBIBA
TUAC
In short
BBIB A plain ladder of 3-to-10-year Treasuries at four basis points. JPMorgan showed up late to this corner of the market and priced its way in, undercutting most of the intermediate Treasury shelf while hugging its index.
TUA Most intermediate Treasury ETFs just buy the bonds. TUA rents the exposure instead: short-term Treasury futures sized to match the duration of the 7-10 year Treasury index, with a calendar-quarter bar written into the mandate.
Stated mandate
BBIB The fund is designed to provide current income and to closely track the investment results of the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year benchmark.
TUA The Fund seeks calendar-quarter total return that matches or exceeds the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, using Treasury futures to target that index’s duration.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBIB vs TUA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBIB vs TUA Cost
Overpaying TUA vs BBIB
$7,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBIB 0.04%
$849
TUA 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBIB | TUA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $705 | $632 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,725 | $2,437 |
| 30 | $849 | $7,898 | $7,049 |
- 0.04%BBIB, cheaper
- 0.39%TUA
- Middle half of Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds
- Median 0.12%
BBIB 4th cheapest of 19 funds
TUA 19th cheapest of 19 funds
BBIB vs TUA Dividends
- BBIB 4.03%, better
- TUA 3.51%
- BBIB $3.86
- TUA $0.69
- BBIB $0.33
- TUA $0.10
- BBIB Oct 1, 2026
- TUA Oct 27, 2026
- BBIB Oct 5, 2026
- TUA Oct 30, 2026
- BBIB Monthly
- TUA Monthly
Distribution history
BBIB vs TUA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBIB 4.7%, betterTUA 8.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBIB 0.01, betterTUA −0.37
- Worst fall
- BBIB −6.4%TUA −16.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BBIB 0.78TUA 1.25
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.