BBIB ranks 4th and UTEN 11th of 19 funds in the Treasuries (3-10 Year) Category.
BBIB vs UTEN
BBIB −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
UTEN 20.0×the volume
5.31K106K
BBIB +0.3pt
+4.5%+4.2%
BBIB vs UTEN Performance
−0.4%−2.0%
- BBIB 0.04%, better
- UTEN 0.15%
- BBIB $77M
- UTEN $265M
- BBIB −0.4%, better
- UTEN −2.0%
- BBIB 4.03%
- UTEN 4.59%, better
- BBIB 82
- UTEN 2
- BBIB 5.31K sh
- UTEN 106K sh, better
- BBIB $95.69
- UTEN $41.67
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBIB | UTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B61Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | F24 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | C52 |
| Durability | C43 | B63Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds
Same Category. BBIB and UTEN are both graded against the same 19 Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBIBA
UTENB
In short
BBIB A plain ladder of 3-to-10-year Treasuries at four basis points. JPMorgan showed up late to this corner of the market and priced its way in, undercutting most of the intermediate Treasury shelf while hugging its index.
UTEN Most Treasury funds hand you a basket spanning 3 to 10 years. UTEN tracks an index built on one bond, the current 10-year note, refreshed as new ones come to auction, with income paid out monthly.
Stated mandate
BBIB The fund is designed to provide current income and to closely track the investment results of the ICE U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year benchmark.
UTEN The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, to generally match the price and yield performance of the ICE BofA Current 10-Year US Treasury Index (GA10). It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBIB vs UTEN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBIB vs UTEN Cost
Overpaying UTEN vs BBIB
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBIB 0.04%
$849
UTEN 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBIB | UTEN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%BBIB, cheaper
- 0.15%UTEN
- Middle half of Treasuries (3-10 Year) funds
- Median 0.12%
BBIB 4th cheapest of 19 funds
UTEN 11th cheapest of 19 funds
BBIB vs UTEN Dividends
- BBIB 4.03%
- UTEN 4.59%, better
- BBIB $3.86
- UTEN $1.91
- BBIB $0.33
- UTEN $0.16
- BBIB Oct 1, 2026
- UTEN Oct 27, 2026
- BBIB Oct 5, 2026
- UTEN Oct 28, 2026
- BBIB Monthly
- UTEN Monthly
Distribution history
BBIB vs UTEN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBIB 4.7%, betterUTEN 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBIB 0.01, betterUTEN −0.02
- Worst fall
- BBIB −6.4%UTEN −13.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BBIB 0.78UTEN 1.26
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.