BBJP ranks 2nd and GSJY 7th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
BBJP vs GSJY
BBJP −0.06pt a year
0.19%0.25%
BBJP 183.5×the volume
1.32M7.19K
GSJY +0.3pt
+8.9%+9.2%
BBJP vs GSJY Performance
+53.1%+55.5%
- BBJP 0.19%, better
- GSJY 0.25%
- BBJP $18.7B
- GSJY $98M
- BBJP +14.9%
- GSJY +15.9%, better
- BBJP 4.71%, better
- GSJY 2.02%
- BBJP 177
- GSJY 162
- BBJP 1.32M sh, better
- GSJY 7.19K sh
- BBJP $75.10
- GSJY $54.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBJP | GSJY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C41 | C43Higher |
| Tradability | A87Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | B59 | B64Higher |
| Durability | A76Higher | C54 |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. BBJP and GSJY are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBJPA
GSJYB
In short
BBJP Japan's whole board for 0.19% a year. JPMorgan's BetaBuilders fund holds roughly 170 large and mid-cap Japanese stocks and has grown into a multi-billion-dollar way to own Tokyo without paying legacy-tracker prices.
GSJY Most Japan ETFs just buy the market. GSJY runs Goldman's ActiveBeta screen instead, tilting a basket of roughly 220 Japanese stocks toward value, momentum, quality and low volatility for a quarter-percent fee.
Stated mandate
BBJP The fund seeks to closely track, before fees and expenses, the performance of a Japan-focused equity index.
GSJY The fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBJP vs GSJY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBJP vs GSJY Cost
Overpaying GSJY vs BBJP
$1,207
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBJP 0.19%
$3,952
GSJY 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBJP | GSJY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $455 | $108 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $1,769 | $418 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $5,159 | $1,207 |
- 0.19%BBJP, cheaper
- 0.25%GSJY
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
BBJP 3rd cheapest of 18 funds
GSJY 4th cheapest of 18 funds
BBJP vs GSJY Dividends
- BBJP 4.71%, better
- GSJY 2.02%
- BBJP $3.54
- GSJY $1.07
- BBJP $3.54
- GSJY $0.41
- BBJP Dec 23, 2025
- GSJY Jun 24, 2026
- BBJP Dec 26, 2025
- GSJY Jun 30, 2026
- BBJP Annual
- GSJY Twice a year
Distribution history
BBJP vs GSJY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBJP
- GSJY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBJP 12.5%GSJY 12.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BBJP 1.14GSJY 1.19, better
- Worst fall
- BBJP −29.1%GSJY −28.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BBJP 0.82GSJY 0.92
BBJP and GSJY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
