FLJP ranks 1st and GSJY 7th of 18 funds in the Japan Category.
FLJP vs GSJY
FLJP −0.16pt a year
0.09%0.25%
FLJP 135.7×the volume
976K7.19K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+9.2%+9.2%
FLJP vs GSJY Performance
+55.0%+55.5%
- FLJP 0.09%, better
- GSJY 0.25%
- FLJP $4.27B
- GSJY $98M
- FLJP +16.4%, better
- GSJY +15.9%
- FLJP 4.26%, better
- GSJY 2.02%
- FLJP 447
- GSJY 162
- FLJP 976K sh, better
- GSJY 7.19K sh
- FLJP $39.98
- GSJY $54.26
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FLJP | GSJY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C48Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A71Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B64 |
| Durability | B61Higher | C54 |
Rank among Japan funds
Same Category. FLJP and GSJY are both graded against the same 18 Japan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FLJPA
GSJYB
In short
FLJP Japan's whole market for nine basis points. FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index across roughly 500 stocks at 0.09%, a fraction of what the typical Japan fund charges.
GSJY Most Japan ETFs just buy the market. GSJY runs Goldman's ActiveBeta screen instead, tilting a basket of roughly 220 Japanese stocks toward value, momentum, quality and low volatility for a quarter-percent fee.
Stated mandate
FLJP The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index.
GSJY The fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FLJP vs GSJY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FLJP vs GSJY Cost
Overpaying GSJY vs FLJP
$3,261
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FLJP 0.09%
$1,898
GSJY 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FLJP | GSJY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $455 | $290 |
| 20 | $646 | $1,769 | $1,123 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $5,159 | $3,261 |
- 0.09%FLJP, cheaper
- 0.25%GSJY
- Middle half of Japan funds
- Median 0.54%
FLJP cheapest of 18 funds
GSJY 4th cheapest of 18 funds
FLJP vs GSJY Dividends
- FLJP 4.26%, better
- GSJY 2.02%
- FLJP $1.69
- GSJY $1.07
- FLJP $0.17
- GSJY $0.41
- FLJP Jun 26, 2026
- GSJY Jun 24, 2026
- FLJP Jul 6, 2026
- GSJY Jun 30, 2026
- FLJP Twice a year
- GSJY Twice a year
Distribution history
FLJP vs GSJY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FLJP
- GSJY
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FLJP 12.5%GSJY 12.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FLJP 1.17GSJY 1.19, better
- Worst fall
- FLJP −28.8%GSJY −28.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FLJP 0.96GSJY 0.92
FLJP and GSJY in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
